Based on the current descriptions, I think Instance Group Model looks more
important for me. Current schedule appears fine for that.
-D
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 10/28/2013 06:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> > I can't make the Wed 2:50 session -- I'm pre
On 10/28/2013 06:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> I can't make the Wed 2:50 session -- I'm presenting at that time -- but
> I don't think it's essential for me to be there anyway. Everything else
> LGTM. Thanks!
Would you rather be able to attend that one (Smarter resource placement
for inte
I can't make the Wed 2:50 session -- I'm presenting at that time -- but I
don't think it's essential for me to be there anyway. Everything else LGTM.
Thanks!
-Deva
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> -Rob
>
> On 29 October 2013 11:16, Russell Bryant wrote:
> >
Thanks!
-Rob
On 29 October 2013 11:16, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 10/28/2013 05:40 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>> Hey Russell, any chance you can shuffle the two tuesday nova sessions
>> on scheduler - 1450 and 1640 - to another day? Both of those are
>> pretty relevant to the baremetal workload a
On 10/28/2013 05:40 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> Hey Russell, any chance you can shuffle the two tuesday nova sessions
> on scheduler - 1450 and 1640 - to another day? Both of those are
> pretty relevant to the baremetal workload aspect of TripleO, the
> former largely for Devananda with his Ironic
