Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[Miles Gould]

I also vote for baremetal-inspection - punning names are fun, but increase the 
amount of stuff new developers have to learn.

I'm totally in for the Peter Sellers marathon, though.

Miles

- Original Message -
> From: "Jay Pipes" 
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Sent: Saturday, 5 December, 2015 2:53:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for 
> a subproject (ironic-inspector in this
> case)
> 
> On 12/04/2015 04:45 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> > 1. "baremetalintrospection" - named after the process we
> > implement
> > 2. "baremetalinspector" - using our code name after the
> > official ironic project name.
> 
> baremetal-inspection is my vote.
> 
> I believe Pavlo will soon be proposing a hardware-composition service
> endpoint as well...
> 
> Best,
> -jay
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[Jay Pipes]

Count me in for being there.

On 12/04/2015 09:29 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:

On 2015-12-04 16:30:17 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:

My take is to rename ironic-inspector to clouseau, the ironic inspector
from the Pink Panther series.


If that comes to pass then count me in for the next Ironic
mid-cycle, which will presumably just be a Peter Sellers movie
marathon?



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[Jay Pipes]

On 12/04/2015 04:45 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:

1. "baremetalintrospection" - named after the process we
implement
2. "baremetalinspector" - using our code name after the
official ironic project name.


baremetal-inspection is my vote.

I believe Pavlo will soon be proposing a hardware-composition service 
endpoint as well...


Best,
-jay

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[Thierry Carrez]

Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> 
>> Specifically, I'm talking about ironic-inspector, which is a auxiliary 
>> service
>> under the bare metal program. My first assumption is to prefix with ironic's
>> official name, so it should be something like 'baremetal-XXX' or 'baremetal
>> XXX'. Is it correct? Which separator is preferred?
> 
> FWIW we have 3 different projects under the telemetry umbrella and they
> do not share any prefix.

My take is to rename ironic-inspector to clouseau, the ironic inspector
from the Pink Panther series.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[Dmitry Tantsur]

On 12/04/2015 04:30 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:

Julien Danjou wrote:

On Fri, Dec 04 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:


Specifically, I'm talking about ironic-inspector, which is a auxiliary service
under the bare metal program. My first assumption is to prefix with ironic's
official name, so it should be something like 'baremetal-XXX' or 'baremetal
XXX'. Is it correct? Which separator is preferred?


FWIW we have 3 different projects under the telemetry umbrella and they
do not share any prefix.


My take is to rename ironic-inspector to clouseau, the ironic inspector
from the Pink Panther series.


You should have raised it back in the beginning of liberty, when we did 
the discoverd->inspector renaming :D






__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[Dmitry Tantsur]

On 12/04/2015 03:33 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:

On Fri, Dec 04 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:


Specifically, I'm talking about ironic-inspector, which is a auxiliary service
under the bare metal program. My first assumption is to prefix with ironic's
official name, so it should be something like 'baremetal-XXX' or 'baremetal
XXX'. Is it correct? Which separator is preferred?


FWIW we have 3 different projects under the telemetry umbrella and they
do not share any prefix.


Do you register all 3 in keystone? What do you use as service types?




Next step is choosing the XXX part. The process we implement in
ironic-inspector is usually referred to as "baremetal introspection" or
"baremetal inspection". The former is used for our OSC plugin, so I think our
official name should be one of
1. "baremetalintrospection" - named after the process we implement
2. "baremetalinspector" - using our code name after the official
ironic project name.


I think 1. makes more sense.


That's what I'll use if nobody objects.. I'm only undecided about the 
separator.




My 2c,

Cheers,




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[milanisko k]

Please, please, please, let's use that in case we decide to have a next
major release :D

--
milan

2015-12-04 16:38 GMT+01:00 Dmitry Tantsur :

> On 12/04/2015 04:30 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
>> Julien Danjou wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 04 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>>>
>>> Specifically, I'm talking about ironic-inspector, which is a auxiliary
 service
 under the bare metal program. My first assumption is to prefix with
 ironic's
 official name, so it should be something like 'baremetal-XXX' or
 'baremetal
 XXX'. Is it correct? Which separator is preferred?

>>>
>>> FWIW we have 3 different projects under the telemetry umbrella and they
>>> do not share any prefix.
>>>
>>
>> My take is to rename ironic-inspector to clouseau, the ironic inspector
>> from the Pink Panther series.
>>
>
> You should have raised it back in the beginning of liberty, when we did
> the discoverd->inspector renaming :D
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[Julien Danjou]

On Fri, Dec 04 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:

> Specifically, I'm talking about ironic-inspector, which is a auxiliary service
> under the bare metal program. My first assumption is to prefix with ironic's
> official name, so it should be something like 'baremetal-XXX' or 'baremetal
> XXX'. Is it correct? Which separator is preferred?

FWIW we have 3 different projects under the telemetry umbrella and they
do not share any prefix.

> Next step is choosing the XXX part. The process we implement in
> ironic-inspector is usually referred to as "baremetal introspection" or
> "baremetal inspection". The former is used for our OSC plugin, so I think our
> official name should be one of
> 1. "baremetalintrospection" - named after the process we implement
> 2. "baremetalinspector" - using our code name after the official
> ironic project name.

I think 1. makes more sense.

My 2c,

Cheers,
-- 
Julien Danjou
// Free Software hacker
// https://julien.danjou.info


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[Lucas Alvares Gomes]

Hi,

> 1. "baremetalintrospection" - named after the process we
> implement

+1 for baremetal-introspection ( or inspection ? )

Cheers,
Lucas

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[Julien Danjou]

On Fri, Dec 04 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:

> Do you register all 3 in keystone? What do you use as service types?

Yes: metering, alarming and metric.

-- 
Julien Danjou
# Free Software hacker
# https://julien.danjou.info


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[Haomeng, Wang]

+1 for baremetal-inspection

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Julien Danjou  wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 04 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>
> > Do you register all 3 in keystone? What do you use as service types?
>
> Yes: metering, alarming and metric.
>
> --
> Julien Danjou
> # Free Software hacker
> # https://julien.danjou.info
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[Jeremy Stanley]

On 2015-12-04 16:30:17 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> My take is to rename ironic-inspector to clouseau, the ironic inspector
> from the Pink Panther series.

If that comes to pass then count me in for the next Ironic
mid-cycle, which will presumably just be a Peter Sellers movie
marathon?
-- 
Jeremy Stanley

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

[Devananda van der Veen]

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Thierry Carrez 
wrote:

> Julien Danjou wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> >
> >> Specifically, I'm talking about ironic-inspector, which is a auxiliary
> service
> >> under the bare metal program. My first assumption is to prefix with
> ironic's
> >> official name, so it should be something like 'baremetal-XXX' or
> 'baremetal
> >> XXX'. Is it correct? Which separator is preferred?
> >
> > FWIW we have 3 different projects under the telemetry umbrella and they
> > do not share any prefix.
>
> My take is to rename ironic-inspector to clouseau, the ironic inspector
> from the Pink Panther series.
>

This will totally get my vote (if there is a vote).

Between the choices you offered, I'd pick "baremetal introspection" as
that's what we call the process which that service performs.

-Deva
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev