On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Arnaud MORIN wrote:
> My objective is to be able to download and upload from glance/computes to
> swift in a faster way.
> I was thinking that if glance could parallelizes the connections to swift
> for a single image (with chunks), it would be faster.
> Am I wrong
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Arnaud MORIN wrote:
> My objective is to be able to download and upload from glance/computes to
> swift in a faster way.
> I was thinking that if glance could parallelizes the connections to swift
> for a single image (with chunks), it would be faster.
> Am I wrong
My objective is to be able to download and upload from glance/computes to
swift in a faster way.
I was thinking that if glance could parallelizes the connections to swift
for a single image (with chunks), it would be faster.
Am I wrong ?
Is there any other way I am not thinking of?
Arnaud.
Le 28
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Arnaud MORIN wrote:
> Hey all,
> So I finally tested your pull requests, it does not work.
> 1 - For uploads, swiftclient is not using threads when source is given by
> glance:
> https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient/blob/master/swiftclient/service.py#L18
Hey all,
So I finally tested your pull requests, it does not work.
1 - For uploads, swiftclient is not using threads when source is given by
glance:
https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient/blob/master/swiftclient/service.py#L1847
2 - For downloads, when requesting the file from swift, it i
Hey,
I would love to see that reviving!
Cheers,
Arnaud
On 6 September 2017 at 21:00, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
> Hey! As you said it's not possible now.
>
> I implemented the support several years ago, bit unfortunately no one
> wanted to review it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218993
> If you
Hey! As you said it's not possible now.
I implemented the support several years ago, bit unfortunately no one
wanted to review it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218993
If you want, we can revive it.
Best,
Mike
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that would
I'm pretty sure that would only be possible with a code change in glance to
move the consumption of the swiftclient abstraction up a layer from the
client/connection objects to swiftclient's service objects [1]. I'm not
sure if that'd be something that would make a lot of sense to the Image
Servic