Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

2014-09-05 Thread Khanh-Toan Tran
+1 for ServerGroup quotas. It's been a while since this feature is
discussed and approved. As a public cloud provider we really want to get
ServerGroup into production. However, without quotas it is more harm than
gain. Since ServerGroup (and even its novaclient's command) is merged in
Icehouse, IMO it is reasonable to secure it in Juno. Otherwise it's a
waste. And as Phil said it is not much a change.

Toan

 -Message d'origine-
 De : Day, Phil [mailto:philip@hp.com]
 Envoyé : vendredi 5 septembre 2014 14:57
 À : OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Objet : [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

 Hi,

 I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for
server
 groups.

 Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful
anti-affinity
 filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, but
without some
 form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its
impossible to
 enable it as a feature in a public cloud.

 The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a
side-effect of
 having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need to
protect the
 change in V2 via yet another extension.

 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/

 Phil

  -Original Message-
  From: Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui [mailto:sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com]
  Sent: 04 September 2014 13:42
  To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
  Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE request serial-ports
 
  Hello,
 
  I would like to request a FFE for 4 changesets to complete the
  blueprint serial-ports.
 
  Topic on gerrit:
 
  https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+br
  anch:master+topic:bp/serial-ports,n,z
 
  Blueprint on launchpad.net:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/serial-ports
 
  They have already been approved but didn't get enough time to be
  merged by the gate.
 
  Sponsored by:
  Daniel Berrange
  Nikola Dipanov
 
  s.
 
  ___
  OpenStack-dev mailing list
  OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
  http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

2014-09-05 Thread Christopher Yeoh
I'm willing to sponsor this


Chris
—
Sent from Mailbox

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:

 Hi,
 I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for 
 server groups.
 Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful 
 anti-affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to 
 use, but without some form of quota control to limit the amount of 
 anti-affinity its impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud.
 The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a 
 side-effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the 
 need to protect the change in V2 via yet another extension.
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/
 Phil
 -Original Message-
 From: Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui [mailto:sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com]
 Sent: 04 September 2014 13:42
 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE request serial-ports
 
 Hello,
 
 I would like to request a FFE for 4 changesets to complete the blueprint
 serial-ports.
 
 Topic on gerrit:
 
 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+br
 anch:master+topic:bp/serial-ports,n,z
 
 Blueprint on launchpad.net:
   https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/serial-ports
 
 They have already been approved but didn't get enough time to be merged
 by the gate.
 
 Sponsored by:
 Daniel Berrange
 Nikola Dipanov
 
 s.
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

2014-09-05 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil philip@hp.com:
 Hi,

 I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for 
 server groups.

 Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful 
 anti-affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to 
 use, but without some form of quota control to limit the amount of 
 anti-affinity its impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud.

 The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a 
 side-effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the 
 need to protect the change in V2 via yet another extension.

 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/

I am happy to sponsor this work.

Thanks
Ken'ichi ohmichi

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

2014-09-05 Thread Day, Phil
The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to Ken'inci):  
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1   so its kind of just a question of 
getting the sequence right.

Phil


 -Original Message-
 From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
 Sent: 05 September 2014 17:05
 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas
 
 On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
  2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil philip@hp.com:
  Hi,
 
  I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for
 server groups.
 
  Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti-
 affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, but
 without some form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its
 impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud.
 
  The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a side-
 effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need to
 protect the change in V2 via yet another extension.
 
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/
 
  I am happy to sponsor this work.
 
  Thanks
  Ken'ichi ohmichi
 
  ___
  OpenStack-dev mailing list
  OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
  http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 
 These look like they are also all blocked by Tempest because it's changing
 return chunks. How does one propose to resolve that, as I don't think there
 is an agreed path up there for to get this into a passing state from my 
 reading
 of the reviews.
 
   -Sean
 
 --
 Sean Dague
 http://dague.net
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

2014-09-05 Thread Michael Still
So, this one is looking for one more core. Any takers?

Michael

On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
 The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to Ken'inci):  
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1   so its kind of just a question of 
 getting the sequence right.

 Phil


 -Original Message-
 From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
 Sent: 05 September 2014 17:05
 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

 On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
  2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil philip@hp.com:
  Hi,
 
  I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for
 server groups.
 
  Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti-
 affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, but
 without some form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its
 impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud.
 
  The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a side-
 effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need to
 protect the change in V2 via yet another extension.
 
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/
 
  I am happy to sponsor this work.
 
  Thanks
  Ken'ichi ohmichi
 
  ___
  OpenStack-dev mailing list
  OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
  http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 These look like they are also all blocked by Tempest because it's changing
 return chunks. How does one propose to resolve that, as I don't think there
 is an agreed path up there for to get this into a passing state from my 
 reading
 of the reviews.

   -Sean

 --
 Sean Dague
 http://dague.net

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Rackspace Australia

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

2014-09-05 Thread Sean Dague
I looked at the Tempest change, it should be landable. I'll sign up for
review on these, as the rest of the patches are pretty straight forward.

-Sean

On 09/05/2014 06:32 PM, Michael Still wrote:
 So, this one is looking for one more core. Any takers?
 
 Michael
 
 On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
 The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to Ken'inci): 
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1   so its kind of just a question 
 of getting the sequence right.

 Phil


 -Original Message-
 From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
 Sent: 05 September 2014 17:05
 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

 On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
 2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil philip@hp.com:
 Hi,

 I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for
 server groups.

 Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti-
 affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, 
 but
 without some form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its
 impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud.

 The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a side-
 effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need to
 protect the change in V2 via yet another extension.

 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/

 I am happy to sponsor this work.

 Thanks
 Ken'ichi ohmichi

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 These look like they are also all blocked by Tempest because it's changing
 return chunks. How does one propose to resolve that, as I don't think there
 is an agreed path up there for to get this into a passing state from my 
 reading
 of the reviews.

   -Sean

 --
 Sean Dague
 http://dague.net

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 
 
 


-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

2014-09-05 Thread Michael Still
Thus, it get approved and added to the etherpad of doom.

Michael

On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
 I looked at the Tempest change, it should be landable. I'll sign up for
 review on these, as the rest of the patches are pretty straight forward.

 -Sean

 On 09/05/2014 06:32 PM, Michael Still wrote:
 So, this one is looking for one more core. Any takers?

 Michael

 On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
 The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to 
 Ken'inci):  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1   so its kind of just 
 a question of getting the sequence right.

 Phil


 -Original Message-
 From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
 Sent: 05 September 2014 17:05
 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

 On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
 2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil philip@hp.com:
 Hi,

 I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for
 server groups.

 Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti-
 affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, 
 but
 without some form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its
 impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud.

 The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a side-
 effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need 
 to
 protect the change in V2 via yet another extension.

 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/

 I am happy to sponsor this work.

 Thanks
 Ken'ichi ohmichi

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 These look like they are also all blocked by Tempest because it's changing
 return chunks. How does one propose to resolve that, as I don't think there
 is an agreed path up there for to get this into a passing state from my 
 reading
 of the reviews.

   -Sean

 --
 Sean Dague
 http://dague.net

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev





 --
 Sean Dague
 http://dague.net

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Rackspace Australia

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev