On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:03:41AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
As we are trying to do smart disaggregation of tests in the gate, I
think it's important to figure out which test configurations seem to be
actually helping, and which aren't. As the swift team has long had a
functional test job, this
On 11/25/2014 10:54 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:03:41AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
As we are trying to do smart disaggregation of tests in the gate, I
think it's important to figure out which test configurations seem to be
actually helping, and which aren't. As the
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:01:04AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
On 11/25/2014 10:54 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:03:41AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
As we are trying to do smart disaggregation of tests in the gate, I
think it's important to figure out which test
This is great!
Sean, I agree with your analysis.
gate-swift-pep8 (yes)
gate-swift-docs (yes)
gate-swift-python27 (yes)
gate-swift-tox-func (yes)
check-swift-dsvm-functional (yes)
check-tempest-dsvm-full(to further ensure glance/heat/cinder checking)
check-grenade-dsvm (I can go either
