On 07/09/14 23:43, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
## avoiding collaboration between bad actors
>
>The two core requirement means that it takes three people (proposer +
>2 core) to collaborate on landing something inappropriate (whether its
>half baked, a misfeature, whatever). Thats only 50% harder than
> tl;dr I think we should drop our 'needs 2x+2 to land' rule and instead
> use 'needs 1x+2'. We can ease up a large chunk of pressure on our
> review bottleneck, with the only significant negative being that core
> reviewers may see less of the code going into the system - but they
> can always rea
On 09/08/2014 11:07 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
> Sean Dague said on Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:22:56AM -0400:
>>> On 09/08/2014 05:17 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
I think this may be a sensible move, but only if it's used primarily to
land the less complex/risky patches more quickly.
>>
>> 2 +2 has be
Sean Dague said on Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:22:56AM -0400:
> > On 09/08/2014 05:17 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> >> I think this may be a sensible move, but only if it's used primarily to
> >> land the less complex/risky patches more quickly.
>
> 2 +2 has been part of OpenStack culture for a long time,
On 09/08/2014 02:52 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 09/08/2014 05:17 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:14:24PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
>>> I hope the subject got your attention :).
>>>
>>> This might be a side effect of my having too many cosmic rays, but its
>>> been percol
On 09/08/2014 08:52 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 09/08/2014 05:17 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:14:24PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
>>> I hope the subject got your attention :).
>>>
>>> This might be a side effect of my having too many cosmic rays, but its
>>> been percol
On 09/08/2014 05:17 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:14:24PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
>> I hope the subject got your attention :).
>>
>> This might be a side effect of my having too many cosmic rays, but its
>> been percolating for a bit.
>>
>> tl;dr I think we should drop o
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:14:24PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
> I hope the subject got your attention :).
>
> This might be a side effect of my having too many cosmic rays, but its
> been percolating for a bit.
>
> tl;dr I think we should drop our 'needs 2x+2 to land' rule and instead
> use 'ne
Responses in-line.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
Date: September 7, 2014 at 20:16:32
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List >
Subject: [openstack-dev] doubling our core review bandwidth
> I hope the subjec
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> I hope the subject got your attention :).
>
> This might be a side effect of my having too many cosmic rays, but its
> been percolating for a bit.
>
> tl;dr I think we should drop our 'needs 2x+2 to land' rule and instead
> use 'needs 1x+2'.
10 matches
Mail list logo