Le 01/04/2016 03:12, Assaf Muller a écrit :
2) Now, transform yourself six to twelve months in the future. We now
face a new problem. (...) I hereby propose that we remove the
tests. (...) Needless to say, my
proposal keeps pep8 in place. We all know how important a consistent
style is.
The
On 01/04/16 02:16, Assaf Muller wrote:
> Have you been negatively impacted by slow development and review
> velocity? Read on.
>
> OpenStack has had a slow review velocity for as long as I can
> remember. This has a cascading effect where people take up multiple
> tasks, so that they can work on
Shinobu Kinjo wrote:
https://review.openstack.org/300271
This change would make sense. But will we have core reviewers election?
Obviously no, since you won’t have a ‘core reviewer’ term now. But what we
really want is having a separate offensive name for those
And now I wish I could delete my messages sent to ML.
On 3/31/16 9:38 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> 2) is a giveaway it's Apr 1 (in some TZs)!
>
>
> On 3/31/16 9:12 PM, Assaf Muller wrote:
>> Have you been negatively impacted by slow development and review
>> velocity? Read on.
>>
>> OpenStack has
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Assaf Muller wrote:
> Have you been negatively impacted by slow development and review
> velocity? Read on.
>
> OpenStack has had a slow review velocity for as long as I can
> remember. This has a cascading effect where people take up multiple
>
2) is a giveaway it's Apr 1 (in some TZs)!
On 3/31/16 9:12 PM, Assaf Muller wrote:
> Have you been negatively impacted by slow development and review
> velocity? Read on.
>
> OpenStack has had a slow review velocity for as long as I can
> remember. This has a cascading effect where people take
Have you been negatively impacted by slow development and review
velocity? Read on.
OpenStack has had a slow review velocity for as long as I can
remember. This has a cascading effect where people take up multiple
tasks, so that they can work on something while the other is being
reviewed. This