i've created a bp to discuss whether moving the alarming into pipeline is
feasible and can cover all the use cases for alarm. if we can find a
solution that is a bit leaner than what we have and still provide same
functionality coverage i don't see why we try it. it very well may be that
what
Chung [mailto:chu...@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 6:09 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Suggestions for alarm improvements
hi Sampath
tbh, i actually like the pipeline solution proposed
Hello, Sampth.
My interest lies in how to evaluate large number of notifications within a
short time.
I thought moving alarms into the pipelines would be a good start.
How about evaluate Synaps for your use case? It evaluates alarms in the storm
topology(pipeline). Moving alarms into the
Hi All,
Sandy did a great job by putting up some valuable points for alarm
improvements in,
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ceilometer/AlarmImprovements
Is there any further discussion about [Part 4 - Moving Alarms into the
Pipelines] in above doc?
I tried to find more info about above topic
Hey y'all,
Here are a few notes I put together around some ideas for alarm improvements.
In order to set it up I spent a little time talking about the Ceilometer
architecture in general, including some of the things we have planned for
IceHouse.
I think Parts 1-3 will be useful to anyone
: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:34 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Suggestions for alarm improvements ...
Hey y'all,
Here are a few notes I put together around some ideas for alarm improvements.
In order to set it up I spent a little time talking about
