Thanks for the clarification :).
Not sure if I'll be in OSCON but who knows :).
Take care.
On Monday, 9 May 2016, Zhipeng Huang wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> Totally understand your reasoning here, however there are some
> misunderstanding :P I'm not familiar with Smaug,
-tech-disc...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Ceph][Kingbird][Tricircle][Smaug]Build a
multisite disaster recovery "stack"
Hello, Sébastien,
Thank you very much that you are interested in Kingbird, which is part of OPNFV
Multisite project. Most of discussion was hel
...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Ceph][Kingbird][Tricircle][Smaug]Build a
multisite disaster recovery "stack"
Thanks for raising this. However we have "good" reasons to not talk about Smaug
and Tricircle.
Those 2 are really focus on NFV use cases, wher
Hi Sebastien,
Totally understand your reasoning here, however there are some
misunderstanding :P I'm not familiar with Smaug, but Tricircle is not a NFV
specific project. We have use cases in OPNFV that is targeting NFV
scenarios.
As you correctly point out about the state of the VM, and
Thanks for raising this. However we have "good" reasons to not talk
about Smaug and Tricircle.
Those 2 are really focus on NFV use cases, where in our scenario we
"only" save Cinder blocks and Glance images.
We do not guarantee the state of the VMs not want to replicate it.
We really aim for a
Hi Folks,
I was referred to this talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWFYC6W71tY by
a colleague, and really think several projects should collaborate on this
subject.
Two projects that are missed from the talk but would be helpful are
Smaug[1] and Tricircle[2]. Smaug provides data protection