)
Cc: Luohao (brian)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Do you think we should introduce the
online-extend feature to cinder ?
Hey,
Sorry I missed this thread a couple of days ago. I am working on a
first-pass of
this and hope to have something soon. So far I've mostly focused
(not for usage questions)
Cc: Luohao (brian)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Do you think we should introduce the
online-extend feature to cinder ?
Hey,
Sorry I missed this thread a couple of days ago. I am working on a
first-pass of
this and hope to have something soon. So far I've mostly
[mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:05 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Luohao (brian)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Do you think we should introduce the
online-extend feature to cinder ?
On Mon, Mar
Hi, stackers:
Libvirt/qemu have supported online-extend for multiple disk formats,
including qcow2, sparse, etc. But Cinder only support offline-extend volumes
currently.
Offline-extend volume will force the instance to be shutoff or the volume
to be detached. I think
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Zhangleiqiang zhangleiqi...@huawei.comwrote:
Hi, stackers:
Libvirt/qemu have supported online-extend for multiple disk
formats, including qcow2, sparse, etc. But Cinder only support
offline-extend volumes currently.
Offline-extend volume will
-extend-volume-extension
--
zhangleiqiang
Best Regards
From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:05 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Luohao (brian)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Do you think we
