Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Requirements for re-adding Gluster support

2017-08-02 Thread Niels de Vos
Thanks to everyone who replied! I'll try to summarize what we'll try to get from the Gluster Community users that run OpenStack. - find an owner/maintainer for the Gluster driver in Cinder little maintenance seems needed, no recent problems reported - get someone to maintain the gate job(s) in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Requirements for re-adding Gluster support

2017-07-28 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 7/26/2017 4:16 PM, Eric Harney wrote: From a technical point of view there are not a lot of steps involved here, we can restore the previous gate jobs and driver code and I expect things would still be in working order. I can help coordinate these things with the new owner. Note that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Requirements for re-adding Gluster support

2017-07-26 Thread Eric Harney
On 07/26/2017 05:08 PM, John Griffith wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Sean McGinnis > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:30:49PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >>> On 2017-07-26 12:56:55 +0200 (+0200), Niels de Vos wrote: >>> [...] My current guess is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Requirements for re-adding Gluster support

2017-07-26 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:30:49PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2017-07-26 12:56:55 +0200 (+0200), Niels de Vos wrote: > > [...] > > > My current guess is that adding a 3rd party CI [3] for Gluster is > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Requirements for re-adding Gluster support

2017-07-26 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:30:49PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-07-26 12:56:55 +0200 (+0200), Niels de Vos wrote: > [...] > > My current guess is that adding a 3rd party CI [3] for Gluster is > > the only missing piece? > [...] > > I thought GlusterFS was free/libre software. If so,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Requirements for re-adding Gluster support

2017-07-26 Thread Duncan Thomas
I believe the previous CI ran on the Openstack CI infrastructure, but was constantly broken and unmaintained (I'm working from memory here). The Cinder team have never cared /where/ the CI is run, and if infra is happy to host the Gluster CI jobs then great. What is needed is somebody to maintain

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Requirements for re-adding Gluster support

2017-07-26 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-07-26 12:56:55 +0200 (+0200), Niels de Vos wrote: [...] > My current guess is that adding a 3rd party CI [3] for Gluster is > the only missing piece? [...] I thought GlusterFS was free/libre software. If so, won't the Cinder team allow upstream testing in OpenStack's CI system for free

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Requirements for re-adding Gluster support

2017-07-26 Thread Duncan Thomas
I think the substantial part was running (and maintaining) the CI. Given the fragility of devstack and tempest, and their dependencies, this is not, unfortunately, a fire-and-forget operation but rather something that requires a fair time investment. Certainly I don't know of any reason other than

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Requirements for re-adding Gluster support

2017-07-26 Thread Niels de Vos
Hello, In one of the last Cinder releases support for Gluster has been dropped. The commit message [1] mentions that the support has been marked deprecated during Newton. It seems that there are quite some users in the Gluster Community that run OpenStack with Gluster storage. These users did