implementation (of
a policy) read it in directly?
Ruby
De : Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 12 février 2015 19:03
À : OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Objet : Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress][Delegation] Google doc for working notes
Hi Debo and Yathiraj
2015 19:03
À : OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Objet : Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress][Delegation] Google doc for working notes
Hi Debo and Yathiraj,
I took a third look at the solver-scheduler docs and code with your comments in
mind. A few things jumped out.
1
Tim
Wanted to clarify a bit. As I have mentioned before: Solver scheduler is
work done before this work (Datalog-constraints) but we had kept it
very generic to be integrated with something like congress. In fact Ramki
(who was one of the members of the original thread when you reached out to
modelling language (e.g. PuLP).
So this is likely to be a major change to the scheduler?
Ruby
De : Debojyoti Dutta [mailto:ddu...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 13 février 2015 14:06
À : OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Objet : Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress][Delegation
Hi Debo and Yathi,
We’re completely on the same page here. We’ve known about the solver-scheduler
for a while now (I even attended your Atlanta talk), and I always expected
Congress would integrate with it. As you say, now it’s a matter of getting
down to the details.
A bit on the context…
Hi Tim,
Glad to collaborate and work towards nailing down the details. Yeah in terms
of policy enforcement from Congress, it makes sense to delegate to
domain-specific policy engines. It will be good to go through this PoC and to
start thinking about the integration points of Congress with
Hi Tim,
Thanks for your response. Excited too to extend the collaboration and ensure
there is no need to duplicate effort in the open source community.
My responses inline.
1) Choice of LP solver.
I see solver-scheduler uses Pulp, which was on the Congress short list as well.
So we’re
Hi Debo and Yathiraj,
I took a third look at the solver-scheduler docs and code with your comments in
mind. A few things jumped out.
1) Choice of LP solver.
I see solver-scheduler uses Pulp, which was on the Congress short list as well.
So we’re highly aligned on the choice of underlying
Hi all,
A (growing) group of folks are interested in working on the problem of
delegating policy from Congress to domain-specific policy engines. We started
looking at an NFV use case: migrating VMs to reduce energy consumption. In
particular we’re looking into building a VM-placement policy
Hi Tim: moving our thread to the mailer. Excited to collaborate!
From: Debo~ Dutta dedu...@cisco.com
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 4:48 PM
To: Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com
Cc: Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi) yud...@cisco.com, Gokul B Kandiraju
go...@us.ibm.com, Prabhakar Kudva
10 matches
Mail list logo
