Hello all, A month ago, I registered a blueprint named "horizon-policy-abstractions" in Congress, the link is: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/congress/+spec/horizon-policy-abstraction. In this BP, I abstract the policy in congress into "name", "object", "violation condition", "action" and "data". And this abstraction will be show in Horizon. By this way, users can express their intent via these elements easier and more intuitional.
In this month, I have completed the spec and discussed it with Janet Yu. she thinks it is a good idea to express users' policy. Now I have submitted the spec, gerrit topic in https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/horizon-policy-abstraction,n,z ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168539/). And I have completed some codes, I think it looks good for typical use cases. So could you give some advices about if this policy abstraction is easy and intuitional to express policies in Congress in your opinion? Thanks a lot! Best regards, Yali Zhang
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
