> On 26 Feb 2016, at 14:40, Jedrzej Nowak wrote:
> 3. describe this everything in fuel docs
> Maybe instead blueprint in 1st step should we create full blown fuel-spec ?
> That spec obviously will not require any QA activities.
If we actually need feedback, then we
>> Maybe instead blueprint in 1st step should we create full blown
If there is anything to be discussed in implementation, or there are
different options to do it, it's better to have blueprint and spec, so
everybody will be able to see what the integration looks like.
As you may now we should integrate solar with fuel in 9.0. Integration in 9.0
will be very experimental and it will not affect fuel except: spec (https://