Guys, could you point out where I suggested to use python for testing
puppet manifests?
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk sgolovat...@mirantis.com
wrote:
We need to write tests in way how Puppet community writes. Though if user
uses salt in one stage, it's fine to use tests
I hope, we don’t even consider using python for that. Let’s be as close as
possible to community and use rspec for manifests.
Regards,
On 29 Jan 2015, at 09:50, Vladimir Kuklin vkuk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Guys, could you point out where I suggested to use python for testing puppet
Guys I just suggested to use serverspec as beaker is a kind of overkill
duplicating our fuel-devops framework, so that we do not need to mess with
beaker ways of environment creation.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Tomasz Napierala tnapier...@mirantis.com
wrote:
I hope, we don’t even consider
Guys, is it crazy idea to write tests for deployment state on node in
python?
It even can be done in unit tests fashion..
I mean there is no strict dependency on tool from puppet world, what is
needed is access to os and shell, maybe some utils.
What plans have Fuel Nailgun team for testing the
We need to write tests in way how Puppet community writes. Though if user
uses salt in one stage, it's fine to use tests on python.
--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Dmitriy Shulyak dshul...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Guys, is it crazy
Moreover I would suggest to use server spec as beaker is already
duplicating part of our infrastructure automatization.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Vladimir Kuklin vkuk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Guys, I suggest that we create a blueprint how to integrate beaker with
our existing
Guys, I suggest that we create a blueprint how to integrate beaker with our
existing infrastructure to increase test coverage. My optimistic estimate
is that we can see its implementation in 7.0.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote:
My understanding is
My understanding is serverspec is not going to work well / going to be
supported. I think it was discusssed on IRC (as i cant find it in my
email). Stackforge/puppet-ceph moved from ?(something)spec to beaker,
as its more functional and actively developed.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Sergii
Hello.
We are working on the modularization of Openstack deployment by puppet
manifests in Fuel library [0].
Each deploy step should be post-verified with some testing framework as
well.
I believe the framework should:
* be shipped as a part of Fuel library for puppet manifests instead of
Hi,
Puppet OpenStack community uses Beaker for acceptance testing. I would
consider it as option [2]
[2] https://github.com/puppetlabs/beaker
--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya bdobre...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hello.
10 matches
Mail list logo
