Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] FFE python-fuelclient improvements

+1 from me also On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/python-fuelclient+branch:master+topic:bp/re-thinking-fuel-client,n,z > > 17 бер. 2015 о 18:51 Mike Scherbakov > написав(ла): > > Roman, > it would be g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] FFE python-fuelclient improvements

https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/python-fuelclient+branch:master+topic:bp/re-thinking-fuel-client,n,z > 17 бер. 2015 о 18:51 Mike

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] FFE python-fuelclient improvements

Roman, it would be great if you share the links. Thanks! On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > Yep, I think we can do merge them. +1 from my side. > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Evgeniy L wrote: > > +1, because those patches are simple don't look destructive. > > > > O

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] FFE python-fuelclient improvements

Yep, I think we can do merge them. +1 from my side. On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Evgeniy L wrote: > +1, because those patches are simple don't look destructive. > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> due to some technical issues we were unable

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] FFE python-fuelclient improvements

+1, because those patches are simple don't look destructive. On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: > Hi folks, > > due to some technical issues we were unable to merge Cliff integration > patches to keep ISO build jobs alive. > Since now the problem is fixed and we are unbl

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] FFE python-fuelclient improvements

Hi folks, due to some technical issues we were unable to merge Cliff integration patches to keep ISO build jobs alive. Since now the problem is fixed and we are unblocked, I’d like to ask for a FFE in order to merge that all. - romcheg signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP