Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Fuel extension with VXLAN support

2014-11-21 Thread Andrew Woodward
> > > > > From: Mike Scherbakov [mailto:mscherba...@mirantis.com] > Sent: vendredi 21 novembre 2014 12:52 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Fuel extension with VXLAN support > > > > Samuel, Vladimir,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Fuel extension with VXLAN support

2014-11-21 Thread samuel.bartel
? Or should we create a new one? From: Mike Scherbakov [mailto:mscherba...@mirantis.com] Sent: vendredi 21 novembre 2014 12:52 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Fuel extension with VXLAN support Samuel, Vladimir, I see a little

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Fuel extension with VXLAN support

2014-11-21 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Samuel, Vladimir, I see a little issue with blueprint and real use cases. Currently we do not collect use cases. Can we start doing this in some section of whether design doc, or in blueprint itself? We've got linux bonds, vxlan, multiple ranges for mgmt network, etc. On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:26

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Fuel extension with VXLAN support

2014-11-21 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Hi, Samuel I think the case that you are talking about is an ability to use arbitrary interfaces for different purposes. AFAIK, this use case is covered by https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/advanced-networking blueprint. On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:04 PM, wrote: > Hello, > > > > I hav

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Fuel extension with VXLAN support

2014-11-21 Thread samuel.bartel
Hello, I have a question regarding futur vxlan support implementation in fuel and the corresponding blueprint. Actually in the blueprint description there is nothing specify about the bridge used for vxlan traffic. In the previous implementation abandoned on gerrit the br-mgmt was assigned for