Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Question about Feature Freeze Exceptions for non-invasive features

[Dmitry Borodaenko]

I understand that, but your question was about requesting an FFE for
this spec, which you wouldn't need to do if you just targeted it to
10.0.

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:39:08PM +0300, Evgeniy L wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> The thing is it may not require changes in Fuel for 10.0 too, ideally we
> would like to add a couple of new gates to OpenStack infra, so they will be
> enabled for external extensions when there are any.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko  > wrote:
> 
> > If the spec is not going to require code changes in 9.0/Mitaka, why not
> > simply target it for 10.0/Newton?
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:21:55PM +0300, Evgeniy L wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We have a spec where we are trying to do research and describe how we are
> > > going to test extensions [0], we will not be able to land it before
> > feature
> > > freeze, so should we get feature freeze exception for it? Or it will not
> > be
> > > a problem to merge it even after FF?
> > >
> > > The spec itself is more about the process which we are going to follow
> > > during extensions development, so there should be no changes for current
> > > projects.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281749/
> >
> > >
> > __
> > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > Unsubscribe:
> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> > __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >

> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Question about Feature Freeze Exceptions for non-invasive features

[Evgeniy L]

Hi Dmitry,

The thing is it may not require changes in Fuel for 10.0 too, ideally we
would like to add a couple of new gates to OpenStack infra, so they will be
enabled for external extensions when there are any.

Thanks,

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko  wrote:

> If the spec is not going to require code changes in 9.0/Mitaka, why not
> simply target it for 10.0/Newton?
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:21:55PM +0300, Evgeniy L wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have a spec where we are trying to do research and describe how we are
> > going to test extensions [0], we will not be able to land it before
> feature
> > freeze, so should we get feature freeze exception for it? Or it will not
> be
> > a problem to merge it even after FF?
> >
> > The spec itself is more about the process which we are going to follow
> > during extensions development, so there should be no changes for current
> > projects.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281749/
>
> >
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Question about Feature Freeze Exceptions for non-invasive features

[Dmitry Borodaenko]

If the spec is not going to require code changes in 9.0/Mitaka, why not
simply target it for 10.0/Newton?

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:21:55PM +0300, Evgeniy L wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We have a spec where we are trying to do research and describe how we are
> going to test extensions [0], we will not be able to land it before feature
> freeze, so should we get feature freeze exception for it? Or it will not be
> a problem to merge it even after FF?
> 
> The spec itself is more about the process which we are going to follow
> during extensions development, so there should be no changes for current
> projects.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281749/

> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Question about Feature Freeze Exceptions for non-invasive features

[Evgeniy L]

Hi,

We have a spec where we are trying to do research and describe how we are
going to test extensions [0], we will not be able to land it before feature
freeze, so should we get feature freeze exception for it? Or it will not be
a problem to merge it even after FF?

The spec itself is more about the process which we are going to follow
during extensions development, so there should be no changes for current
projects.

Thanks,

[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281749/
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev