Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-16 Thread Evgeniy L
That is awesome, happy to finally see it enabled! On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Anastasia Urlapova wrote: > Aleksey, great news! > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Alexey Shtokolov > wrote: > >> Fuelers, >> >> Task based deployment engine

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-15 Thread Anastasia Urlapova
Aleksey, great news! On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Alexey Shtokolov wrote: > Fuelers, > > Task based deployment engine has been enabled in master (Fuel 9.0) by > default [0] > > [0] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273693/ > > WBR, Alexey Shtokolov > > 2016-02-09

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-15 Thread Alexey Shtokolov
Fuelers, Task based deployment engine has been enabled in master (Fuel 9.0) by default [0] [0] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273693/ WBR, Alexey Shtokolov 2016-02-09 21:57 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Kuklin : > Folks > > It seems that docker removal spoilt our celebration a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-09 Thread Anastasia Urlapova
+1 On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Evgeniy L wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < > vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> +1 to enable it ASAP. >> >> It will also affect our deployment tests (~1 hour vs. ~2.5 hours). >> >> Vladimir Kozhukalov

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-09 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 08.02.2016 17:05, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > Hey Fuelers, > > When we are going to enable it? I think since HCF is passed for > stable/8.0, it's time to enable task-based deployment for master > branch. > > Opinion? This must be done for the 9.0, IMHO. > > - Igor > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-09 Thread Evgeniy L
+1 On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > +1 to enable it ASAP. > > It will also affect our deployment tests (~1 hour vs. ~2.5 hours). > > Vladimir Kozhukalov > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Bulat Gaifullin > wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-09 Thread Alexander Kislitsky
+1 On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Anastasia Urlapova wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Evgeniy L wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < >> vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 to enable it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-09 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Well, I'm going to build a new ISO and run BVT. As soon as they are green, I'm going to approve the change. On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 08.02.2016 17:05, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: >> Hey Fuelers, >> >> When we are going to enable it? I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-09 Thread Alexey Shtokolov
Igor, We are going to run a swarm test today against the ISO with enabled task-based deployment, than check results and merge changes tomorrow. I've run BVT more than 100 times, it works, but I would like to check more deployment cases. And I guess it should be easy to troubleshoot if

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-09 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
> I've run BVT more than 100 times, it works, You run it some time ago. There were a lot of opportunities to introduce regression in both Nailgun and tasks of Fuel Library. ;) > We are going to run a swarm test today against the ISO with enabled > task-based deployment So there will be a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-09 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Folks It seems that docker removal spoilt our celebration a bit. Here is a bug link https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1543720 . Fix is trivial, but will postpone swarm run for another day. Nevertheless, it seems to be the only issue affecting our ability to use TBD. Stay tuned! On Tue, Feb

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-08 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Hey Fuelers, When we are going to enable it? I think since HCF is passed for stable/8.0, it's time to enable task-based deployment for master branch. Opinion? - Igor On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 02.02.2016 17:35, Alexey Shtokolov wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-08 Thread Bulat Gaifullin
+1. Regards, Bulat Gaifullin Mirantis Inc. > On 08 Feb 2016, at 19:05, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > > Hey Fuelers, > > When we are going to enable it? I think since HCF is passed for > stable/8.0, it's time to enable task-based deployment for master > branch. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-08 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
+1 to enable it ASAP. It will also affect our deployment tests (~1 hour vs. ~2.5 hours). Vladimir Kozhukalov On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Bulat Gaifullin wrote: > +1. > > Regards, > Bulat Gaifullin > Mirantis Inc. > > > > > On 08 Feb 2016, at 19:05, Igor Kalnitsky

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-03 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 02.02.2016 17:35, Alexey Shtokolov wrote: > Hi Fuelers! > > As you may be aware, since [0] Fuel has implemented a new orchestration > engine [1] > We switched the deployment paradigm from role-based (aka granular) to > task-based and now Fuel can deploy all nodes simultaneously using >

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Task Based Deployment Is at Least Twice Faster

2016-02-02 Thread Alexey Shtokolov
Hi Fuelers! As you may be aware, since [0] Fuel has implemented a new orchestration engine [1] We switched the deployment paradigm from role-based (aka granular) to task-based and now Fuel can deploy all nodes simultaneously using cross-node dependencies between deployment tasks. This feature is