Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-04-15 Thread Dmitry Pyzhov
FYI. We are going to disable Multi-node mode on UI even in experimental mode. And we will remove related code from nailgun in 7.0. https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1428054 On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: What do you guys think about switching

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-04-15 Thread Tomasz Napierala
Do you mean single node? On 15 Apr 2015, at 17:04, Dmitry Pyzhov dpyz...@mirantis.com wrote: FYI. We are going to disable Multi-node mode on UI even in experimental mode. And we will remove related code from nailgun in 7.0. https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1428054 On Fri, Jan 30,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-04-15 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Tomasz, multi-node mode is a legacy non-HA mode with only 1 controller. Currently, our so-called HA mode support deployment with 1 controller, so it makes no sense to support both modes. On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Tomasz Napierala tnapier...@mirantis.com wrote: Do you mean single node?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-04-15 Thread Tomasz Napierala
Sorry, I just mixed the names ;) On 15 Apr 2015, at 18:25, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com wrote: Tomasz, multi-node mode is a legacy non-HA mode with only 1 controller. Currently, our so-called HA mode support deployment with 1 controller, so it makes no sense to support both modes.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-30 Thread Aleksandr Didenko
What do you guys think about switching CentOS CI job [1] to HA with single controller (1 controller + 1 or 2 computes)? Just to verify that our replacement of Simple mode works fine. [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:54

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-30 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent! On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov ibeli...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN . Job naming schema has

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-29 Thread Aleksandr Didenko
Mike, Any objections / additional suggestions? no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1] [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, one of the things we should not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-29 Thread Igor Belikov
Folks, Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN . Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all other jobs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-28 Thread Sergey Vasilenko
+1 to replace simple to HA with one controller /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-28 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Folks, one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating jobs/tests. [1], [2]. One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as [3], [4]. I suggest to change tests. First of all, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-27 Thread Stanislaw Bogatkin
+1 On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of issues that would make further development of this feature much more complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-27 Thread Andrew Woodward
not to prolong single mode, I'd like to see it die. However we will need to be able to add, change, remove, or noop portions of the tasks graph in the future. Many of the plugins that cant currently be built would rely on being able to sub out parts of the graph. How is that going to factor into

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-27 Thread Dmitriy Shulyak
not to prolong single mode, I'd like to see it die. However we will need to be able to add, change, remove, or noop portions of the tasks graph in the future. Many of the plugins that cant currently be built would rely on being able to sub out parts of the graph. How is that going to factor

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-27 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
+1 -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Stanislaw Bogatkin sbogat...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, After starting implementing granular deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-27 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
+1 to simple mode removal On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Stanislaw Bogatkin sbogat...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of issues that would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-27 Thread Aleksandr Didenko
Hi, After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of issues that would make further development of this feature much more complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For example: simple mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2015-01-27 Thread Tomasz Napierala
+1, long awaited On 27 Jan 2015, at 14:05, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of issues that would make further development of this feature much more complicated if we have to support both Simple and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2014-08-26 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Definitely fuel spec is needed :) On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Andrew, I have some comments regarding to you action items 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli We

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2014-08-25 Thread Andrew Woodward
Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread. as Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2014-08-25 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Thanks, Andrew. I think it's worth to track as a normal feature with formal fuel-specs, as it touches too many things (docs and a number of tests). Should be short spec though. On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: Started a new thread so that we don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

2014-08-25 Thread Evgeniy L
Hi Andrew, I have some comments regarding to you action items 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of cluster. What we have to do here is to use