Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Gerrit is blocking the workflow with -2 for reason

2016-09-01 Thread Hemanth Makkapati
Erno, Totally with you on not circumventing the process. I regret the fact that I had to resort to "side-stepping" your -2. But, please let's not look at this incident in isolation. We had to do it considering the circumstances that 1. You were unavailable to remove the -2 2. N-3 milestone is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Gerrit is blocking the workflow with -2 for reason

2016-09-01 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On 9/1/16, 7:31 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote: >On 01/09/16 08:50 +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote: >>Hi all, >> >>As it seems by the "Improving help text for *" string of patches like >>[0][1] that the Glance core group is willing to get around -2s by >>abandoning, reproposing and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Gerrit is blocking the workflow with -2 for reason

2016-09-01 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 01/09/16 08:50 +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote: Hi all, As it seems by the "Improving help text for *" string of patches like [0][1] that the Glance core group is willing to get around -2s by abandoning, reproposing and merging just because not all of us are around in US office hours, I'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Gerrit is blocking the workflow with -2 for reason

2016-09-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Erno Kuvaja Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: September 1, 2016 at 02:51:42 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Gerrit is blocking the workflow with -2 for reason

2016-09-01 Thread Erno Kuvaja
Hi all, As it seems by the "Improving help text for *" string of patches like [0][1] that the Glance core group is willing to get around -2s by abandoning, reproposing and merging just because not all of us are around in US office hours, I'd like to propose that we would just remove the -2 right