Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Multi-engine design feedback requested

2013-08-30 Thread Jason Dunsmore
Heat devs,

There's been some good discussion on the Etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/vJKcZcQOU9

I've added a Votes section under alternate options 1-5.  Please read
over the discussion and add your vote.

Thanks,
Jason


On Thu, Aug 29 2013, Jason Dunsmore wrote:

 Heat devs,

 Liang pointed out a race-condition in the current multi-engine
 implementation that will be difficult to fix without a DB lock.  I've
 discussed the multi-engine design with my teammates and written up a few
 alternative designs here:
 https://etherpad.openstack.org/vJKcZcQOU9

 Every design has its own downsides, so I was hoping to get some feedback
 from the core devs as to which one is preferable.

 Feel free to add comments in-line.  Please don't click Clear Authorship
 Colors ;)

 Thanks,
 Jason

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Heat] Multi-engine design feedback requested

2013-08-29 Thread Jason Dunsmore
Heat devs,

Liang pointed out a race-condition in the current multi-engine
implementation that will be difficult to fix without a DB lock.  I've
discussed the multi-engine design with my teammates and written up a few
alternative designs here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/vJKcZcQOU9

Every design has its own downsides, so I was hoping to get some feedback
from the core devs as to which one is preferable.

Feel free to add comments in-line.  Please don't click Clear Authorship
Colors ;)

Thanks,
Jason

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev