Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-09-03 Thread Zane Bitter
On 03/09/15 02:56, Angus Salkeld wrote: On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:53 AM Zane Bitter > wrote: On 02/09/15 04:55, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: >> On 2 September 2015 at 11:53,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-09-03 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:53 AM Zane Bitter wrote: > On 02/09/15 04:55, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: > >> On 2 September 2015 at 11:53, Angus Salkeld > wrote: > >> > >>> 1. limit the number of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-09-03 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:48 AM Zane Bitter wrote: > On 03/09/15 02:56, Angus Salkeld wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:53 AM Zane Bitter > > wrote: > > > > On 02/09/15 04:55, Steven Hardy wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-09-02 Thread Steven Hardy
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: > On 2 September 2015 at 11:53, Angus Salkeld wrote: > > > 1. limit the number of resource actions in parallel (maybe base on the > > number of cores) > > I'm having trouble mapping that back to 'and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-09-02 Thread Zane Bitter
On 02/09/15 04:55, Steven Hardy wrote: On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: On 2 September 2015 at 11:53, Angus Salkeld wrote: 1. limit the number of resource actions in parallel (maybe base on the number of cores) I'm having trouble

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-09-01 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Anant Patil's message of 2015-08-30 23:01:29 -0700: > Hi Angus, > > Thanks for doing the tests with convergence. We are now assured that > convergence has not impacted the performance in a negative way. Given > that, in convergence, a stack provisioning process goes through a lot of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-09-01 Thread Fox, Kevin M
, 2015 4:53 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far) On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:45 PM Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com<mailto:sha...@redhat.com>> wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:3

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-09-01 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:45 PM Steven Hardy wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:35:52AM +, Angus Salkeld wrote: > >Hi > >I have been running some rally tests against convergence and our > existing > >implementation to compare. > >So far I have done the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-09-01 Thread Steven Hardy
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:35:52AM +, Angus Salkeld wrote: >Hi >I have been running some rally tests against convergence and our existing >implementation to compare. >So far I have done the following: > 1. defined a template with a resource >groupA >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-09-01 Thread Anant Patil
When the stack fails, it is marked as FAILED and all the sync points that are needed to trigger the next set of resources are deleted. The resources at same level in the graph, like here, they are suppose to timeout or fail for an exception. Many DB hits means that the cache data we were

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-09-01 Thread Robert Collins
On 2 September 2015 at 11:53, Angus Salkeld wrote: > 1. limit the number of resource actions in parallel (maybe base on the > number of cores) I'm having trouble mapping that back to 'and heat-engine is running on 3 separate servers'. -Rob -- Robert Collins

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-08-31 Thread Anant Patil
Hi Angus, Thanks for doing the tests with convergence. We are now assured that convergence has not impacted the performance in a negative way. Given that, in convergence, a stack provisioning process goes through a lot of RPC calls, it puts a lot of load on the message broker and the request

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-08-28 Thread Sergey Kraynev
Angus! it's Awesome! Thank you for the investigation. I had a talk with guys from Sahara team and we decided to start testing convergence with Sahara after L release. I suppose, that Murano can also join to this process. Also AFAIK Sahara team plan to create functional tests with Heat-engine.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-08-28 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:35 PM Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, great, it seems like migration to convergence could happen soon. How many times you were running each test case? Does time changing with number of iterations? Are you planning to test parallel stacks creation?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-08-28 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hi, great, it seems like migration to convergence could happen soon. How many times you were running each test case? Does time changing with number of iterations? Are you planning to test parallel stacks creation? Thanks. On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Sergey Kraynev skray...@mirantis.com

[openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

2015-08-27 Thread Angus Salkeld
Hi I have been running some rally tests against convergence and our existing implementation to compare. So far I have done the following: 1. defined a template with a resource group