On 18/11/13 12:15, Mitsuru Kanabuchi wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:46:44 +0100
Zane Bitter wrote:
Yes, but you don't know the UUID until you know it, and by then it's too
late (the resource has been created). So the idempotency token has to be
something passed in by the user.
I completely a
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:46:44 +0100
Zane Bitter wrote:
> Yes, but you don't know the UUID until you know it, and by then it's too
> late (the resource has been created). So the idempotency token has to be
> something passed in by the user.
I completely agree with you that token has to be somet
On 13/11/13 23:35, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 11/13/2013 04:19 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
Of course the idempotency token *should* be just the name, but since
most projects have inexplicably chosen not to enforce unique names (in
tenant scope), we're in the odd position of requiring 3 ways to look up
Thank you for comments!
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:02:34 +1300
Steve Baker wrote:
> On 11/12/2013 07:40 PM, Mitsuru Kanabuchi wrote:
> (snip)
> Just to confirm, my understanding of the outcome of that session was
> that pythonclients should implement retries of failed requests with the
> idempotency
On 11/13/2013 04:19 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
Of course the idempotency token *should* be just the name, but since
most projects have inexplicably chosen not to enforce unique names (in
tenant scope), we're in the odd position of requiring 3 ways to look up
any resource (by name, UUID, and idempote
On 13/11/13 23:02, Steve Baker wrote:
On 11/12/2013 07:40 PM, Mitsuru Kanabuchi wrote:
Hello Heat folks.
Thank you very much for a lot of discussion about API-retry-with-idempotency
at Hong Kong summit.
I wrote discussion's points to summit etherpad.
Sorry for the delay.
https://etherpad.o
On 11/12/2013 07:40 PM, Mitsuru Kanabuchi wrote:
> Hello Heat folks.
>
> Thank you very much for a lot of discussion about API-retry-with-idempotency
> at Hong Kong summit.
>
> I wrote discussion's points to summit etherpad.
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-sum
Hello Heat folks.
Thank you very much for a lot of discussion about API-retry-with-idempotency
at Hong Kong summit.
I wrote discussion's points to summit etherpad.
Sorry for the delay.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-summit-heat-convergence
Please comment me if I'm misunderstanding
