Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Generic solution for bare metal testing

2016-04-14 Thread Ben Nemec
On 04/12/2016 09:17 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 02:42:09AM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2016-04-06 18:33:06 +0300 (+0300), Igor Belikov wrote: >> [...] >>> I suppose there are security issues when we talk about running >>> custom code on bare metal slaves, but I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Generic solution for bare metal testing

2016-04-12 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 02:42:09AM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-04-06 18:33:06 +0300 (+0300), Igor Belikov wrote: > [...] > > I suppose there are security issues when we talk about running > > custom code on bare metal slaves, but I'm not sure I understand > > the difference from running

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Generic solution for bare metal testing

2016-04-06 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-04-06 18:33:06 +0300 (+0300), Igor Belikov wrote: [...] > I suppose there are security issues when we talk about running > custom code on bare metal slaves, but I'm not sure I understand > the difference from running custom code on a virtual machine if > bare metal nodes are isolated,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Generic solution for bare metal testing

2016-04-06 Thread Paul Belanger
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 06:33:06PM +0300, Igor Belikov wrote: > Hey Stackers, > > In Fuel we use bare metal testing for deployment tests. This is essentially a > core component of Fuel CI and as much as we like having it around we’d rather > spend time and resources integrating with upstream

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Generic solution for bare metal testing

2016-04-06 Thread Igor Belikov
Hey Stackers, In Fuel we use bare metal testing for deployment tests. This is essentially a core component of Fuel CI and as much as we like having it around we’d rather spend time and resources integrating with upstream instead of growing and polishing third-party testing solutions. On one