Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposal for slight change in our spec process

2014-08-07 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On August 7, 2014 at 8:36:16 AM, Matt Wagner (matt.wag...@redhat.com) wrote: On 07/08/14 14:17 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:    >2. We'll need to speed up spec reviews, because we're adding one more  >blocker on the way to the code being merged :) Maybe it's no longer a  >problem actually, we're doi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposal for slight change in our spec process

2014-08-07 Thread Matt Wagner
On 07/08/14 14:17 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: 2. We'll need to speed up spec reviews, because we're adding one more blocker on the way to the code being merged :) Maybe it's no longer a problem actually, we're doing it faster now. I'm not sure if this will actually delay stuff getting merged.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposal for slight change in our spec process

2014-08-07 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
Hi! On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 12:33 -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > Hi all! > > > The following idea came out of last week's midcycle for how to improve > our spec process and tracking on launchpad. I think most of us liked > it, but of course, not everyone was there, so I'll attempt to write

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposal for slight change in our spec process

2014-08-06 Thread Chris K
; From: Lucas Alvares Gomes > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 2:34 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposal for slight change in our > specprocess > > Already agreed with the idea at the midcycle, bu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposal for slight change in our spec process

2014-08-06 Thread Jay Faulkner
: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposal for slight change in our spec process Already agreed with the idea at the midcycle, but just making it public: +1 On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: > Hi! > > I think this is a nice idea indeed. Do you plan to use thi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposal for slight change in our spec process

2014-08-06 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Already agreed with the idea at the midcycle, but just making it public: +1 On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: > Hi! > > I think this is a nice idea indeed. Do you plan to use this process starting > from Juno or as soon as possible? It will start in Kilo ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposal for slight change in our spec process

2014-08-05 Thread Matt Wagner
On 05/08/14 12:33 -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote: Hi all! The following idea came out of last week's midcycle for how to improve our spec process and tracking on launchpad. I think most of us liked it, but of course, not everyone was there, so I'll attempt to write out what I recall. This

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposal for slight change in our spec process

2014-08-05 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
Hi! I think this is a nice idea indeed. Do you plan to use this process starting from Juno or as soon as possible? - Roman On Aug 5, 2014, at 22:33, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > Hi all! > > The following idea came out of last week's midcycle for how to improve our > spec process and t

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposal for slight change in our spec process

2014-08-05 Thread Devananda van der Veen
Hi all! The following idea came out of last week's midcycle for how to improve our spec process and tracking on launchpad. I think most of us liked it, but of course, not everyone was there, so I'll attempt to write out what I recall. This would apply to new specs proposed for Kilo (since the new