On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
1. each driver must adhere to the existing driver interfaces.
2. each driver must have comprehensive unit test coverage and
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've been thinking about how we should treat third-party drivers in
Ironic for a while, and had several discussions at the
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've been thinking about how we should treat third-party drivers in Ironic
for a while, and had several discussions at the Hong Kong summit and last
week at LCA. Cinder, Nova, Neutron, and TripleO
Hi all,
I've been thinking about how we should treat third-party drivers in Ironic
for a while, and had several discussions at the Hong Kong summit and last
week at LCA. Cinder, Nova, Neutron, and TripleO are all having similar
discussions, too. What follows is a summary of my thoughts and a
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
1. each driver must adhere to the existing driver interfaces.
2. each driver must have comprehensive unit test coverage and sufficient
inline documentation.
3. vendors are responsible for fixing bugs in
