Michal,
Thanks for setting this up. For future votes using civs, I’d recommend keeping
polling results hidden until the poll is completed as to not unduly influence
voters by the current incomplete polling results.
If folks would like to use civs in favor of our current mailing list voting
us
Sure, I simply pasted what was in the etherpad. I didn't want to cut
anything out as some things might be seemingly closed but people in
fact would like to talk more about them. Let see how priorities will
look like after couple days:)
Also, please vote!
On 21 September 2016 at 12:54, Swapnil Kul
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> One note in this poll. Repo-split has already reached a consensus decision
> via ml vote, and the activity around that will happen prior to summit, so it
> is probably worth ignoring entirely.
>
> Regards
> -steve
>
>
> On 9/21/16,
One note in this poll. Repo-split has already reached a consensus decision via
ml vote, and the activity around that will happen prior to summit, so it is
probably worth ignoring entirely.
Regards
-steve
On 9/21/16, 10:14 AM, "Michał Jastrzębski" wrote:
Hello,
Now, when we have
Hello,
Now, when we have full list of sessions, let's prioritize them
accordingly to our preferences. Based on this we'll allocate our
summit space.
http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/vote.pl?id=E_8368e1e74f8a0049&akey=91bbcf4baeff0a2f
