Wu" <wk...@cn.ibm.com<mailto:wk...@cn.ibm.com>>
>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
>
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Mag
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to
provision minion nodes
Message-ID: <201604271004.u3ra49v4008...@d23av04.au.ibm.com>
Con
List \(not for usage questions\)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to
provision minion nodes
Message-ID: <201604271004.u3ra49v4008...@d23av04.au.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
gt;
Date: 27/04/2016 03:10 pm
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to
provision minion nodes
Hi Hong bin,
Thanks very much. It’s good suggestion, I think it is a good way by using
labels for extra flavors. But I notice that there is not
rg>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to
> provision minion nodes
>
> Hi Hongbin, Ricardo
> This is mike, I am working with Gary now.
> Thanks for Ricardo's good suggestion. I have tried the "map/index"
> method , we can
> -Original Message-
> From: Ma, Wen-Tao (Mike, HP Servers-PSC-BJ) [mailto:wentao...@hpe.com]
> Sent: April-26-16 3:01 AM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to
> provision minion nodes
>
Gary, HPServers-Core-OE-PSC)
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 3:37 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> lists.openstack.org<http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>>
> Cc: Ma, Wen-Tao (Mike, HP Servers-PSC-BJ) hpe.com
ervers-Core-OE-PSC)
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 3:37 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Cc: Ma, Wen-Tao (Mike, HP Servers-PSC-BJ) <wentao...@hpe.com>
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor
Core-OE-PSC)
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 3:37 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Cc: Ma, Wen-Tao (Mike, HP Servers-PSC-BJ) <wentao...@hpe.com>
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to
prov
ent: Monday, April 25, 2016 3:37 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Cc: Ma, Wen-Tao (Mike, HP Servers-PSC-BJ) <wentao...@hpe.com>
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to
prov
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to
provision minion nodes
Hi Hongbin.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>
>
vision minion nodes
From: Duan, Li-Gong (Gary, HPServers-Core-OE-PSC) [mailto:li-gong.d...@hpe.com]
Sent: April-20-16 3:39 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to provision
minion nodes
Hi Folk
C)" <li-gong.d...@hpe.com>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Date: 21/04/2016 02:31 pm
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magn
t for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Date: 21/04/2016 02:31 pm
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to
provision minion nodes
Hi Eli,
This is exactly what I want. If you guys think this requirement is
reasonable, I’d
@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to
provision minion nodes
Kannan,
I think Duan Li is talking about using both 2 kinds of (secure-booted and
non-secure-booted) node deploy *minion* node.
The scenario may like this:
let say 2 flavors
v@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: 20/04/2016 03:46 pm
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to provision
minion nodes
Hi Folks,
We are considering whether Magnum can supports 2 Nova flavors to provision
Kubernetes and other COE minion
estions)
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to provision
> minion nodes
>
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> We are considering whether Magnum can supports 2 Nova flavors to provision
> Kubernetes and other COE minion nodes.
>
> This requir
.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Hongbin Lu [hongbin...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 11:13 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to
provision minion nodes
From: Duan
From: Duan, Li-Gong (Gary, HPServers-Core-OE-PSC) [mailto:li-gong.d...@hpe.com]
Sent: April-20-16 3:39 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to provision
minion nodes
Hi Folks,
We are considering
Kannan,
I think Duan Li is talking about using both 2 kinds of (secure-booted
and non-secure-booted) node deploy *minion* node.
The scenario may like this:
let say 2 flavors:
* flavor_secure
* flavor_none_secure
For now, flavor-id in baymodel can only be set as one value, Duan Li's
<li-gong.d...@hpe.com>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Date: 20/04/2016 03:46 pm
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to
pro
Hi Folks,
We are considering whether Magnum can supports 2 Nova flavors to provision
Kubernetes and other COE minion nodes.
This requirement comes from the below use cases:
- There are 2 kind of baremetal machines in customer site: one is
legacy machines which doesn't support UEFI
22 matches
Mail list logo
