Hi, John. In the Friday session, the community agreed that groups would
support multiple share types in the same group, that they would be called
‘share groups’, and that a higher-level, multi-backend grouping construct to be
discussed later would be more flexible if based on something like
Hi all,
Back in the office with only minor jetlag... unfortunately I had to
skip the discussion last Friday, I was wondering if there was much
more discussion about how share groups were going to work, especially
from a driver POV? The etherpad notes are mainly recap.
I'd like to get ahead of
