Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Tempest scenario tests vs. gate condition

2015-12-07 Thread John Spray
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > On 12/03/2015 06:38 AM, John Spray wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> We're working towards getting the devstack/CI parts ready to test the >> forthcoming ceph native driver, and have a question: will a driver be >> accepted into the tree if it has CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Tempest scenario tests vs. gate condition

2015-12-07 Thread Ben Swartzlander
On 12/03/2015 06:38 AM, John Spray wrote: Hi, We're working towards getting the devstack/CI parts ready to test the forthcoming ceph native driver, and have a question: will a driver be accepted into the tree if it has CI for running the api/ tempest tests, but not the scenario/ tempest tests?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Tempest scenario tests vs. gate condition

2015-12-04 Thread Valeriy Ponomaryov
Hello John, If I am not mistaken, none of existing Third-Party CIs run scenario tests. So, it can not be the blocker for you. It is true to say that, for the moment, API tests is enough for Third-Party CI. Regards, Valeriy Ponomaryov On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:38 PM, John Spray wrote: > Hi, > >

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Tempest scenario tests vs. gate condition

2015-12-03 Thread John Spray
Hi, We're working towards getting the devstack/CI parts ready to test the forthcoming ceph native driver, and have a question: will a driver be accepted into the tree if it has CI for running the api/ tempest tests, but not the scenario/ tempest tests? The context is that because the scenario tes