On 06/28/2013 06:49 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi Russell
Your tool is awesome.
I have also two idea (I believe it's not crazy :P ).
1) Show LOC of the review
Long patch takes long time..
2) Show priority of the review
If it shows priority of the review, it wil be more useful, because
we
Interesting, thanks for trying that. I think this is the time people
feel the most.
It should help set expectations on how long it will take to get your
change into trunk. It seems, on average, to take two weeks.
Hopefully it is useful to spot reviews that are proving tricky to get
in, and they
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Russell Bryant
rbry...@redhat.comwrote:The results are much better than I was
afraid of. On average across
all
projects, patches waiting for review have an age of just under 14 days
since they were first posted. Nova is below average, sitting at an
average
On 06/28/2013 08:24 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
How about time since first revision or -1 applied (but not including -1s
by Jenkins due to gate flakiness), whichever is shorter. That eliminates
non trivial rebases which I've found are often required after about 7
days but doesn't push out the
On 06/28/2013 12:18 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Hey I made the list!
_https://review.openstack.org/#/c/25355/_
Just wanted to point out for nova in longest-waiting reviews based on
first revision:
1.94 days, 12 hours, 49 minutes
- _https://review.openstack.org/25355_ (PowerVM
