Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] [FFE] Support TOSCA definitions for applications

2016-03-10 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Serg Melikyan's message of 2016-03-07 12:19:33 -0800:
> I have no objection regarding granting this FFE.
> 
> This feature is developed as a plugin for Murano, placed in contrib
> folder and is not going to affect our main codebase in any way, so I
> am pretty sure that it's safe to grant this FFE.
> 
> If there are not objections, I propose to consider FFE granted.

Keep in mind that we will be tagging initial release candidates next
week. Since that second patch is still failing CI, it's at risk of not
making it into your release, and we wouldn't want to add it after the
first release candidate (really, after RC1 *only* bug fixes should be
merged).

Doug

> 
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Tetiana Lashchova
>  wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to request a feature freeze exception for "Support TOSCA
> > definitions for applications" [1].
> > The spec is already merged [2], patch is on review [3] and the task is
> > almost finished.
> > I am looking forward for your decision about considering this change for a
> > FFE.
> >
> > [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/support-tosca-format
> > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/194422/
> > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243872/
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tetiana
> >
> > __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> 

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] [FFE] Support TOSCA definitions for applications

2016-03-07 Thread Serg Melikyan
I have no objection regarding granting this FFE.

This feature is developed as a plugin for Murano, placed in contrib
folder and is not going to affect our main codebase in any way, so I
am pretty sure that it's safe to grant this FFE.

If there are not objections, I propose to consider FFE granted.

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Tetiana Lashchova
 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to request a feature freeze exception for "Support TOSCA
> definitions for applications" [1].
> The spec is already merged [2], patch is on review [3] and the task is
> almost finished.
> I am looking forward for your decision about considering this change for a
> FFE.
>
> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/support-tosca-format
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/194422/
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243872/
>
> Thanks,
> Tetiana
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Serg Melikyan, Senior Software Engineer at Mirantis, Inc.
http://mirantis.com | smelik...@mirantis.com

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Murano] [FFE] Support TOSCA definitions for applications

2016-03-03 Thread Tetiana Lashchova
Hi all,

I would like to request a feature freeze exception for "Support TOSCA
definitions for applications" [1].
The spec is already merged [2], patch is on review [3] and the task is
almost finished.
I am looking forward for your decision about considering this change for a
FFE.

[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/support-tosca-format
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/194422/
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243872/

Thanks,
Tetiana
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev