Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-24 Thread thomas.morin
[mailto:tmmorin.ora...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 7:25 PM To: A, Keshava; OpenStack Dev Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal   Hi,   2014-06-22, A, Keshava:   I have some of the basic question about deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-23 Thread Ian Wells
On 21 June 2014 17:17, A, Keshava keshav...@hp.com wrote: Hi Thomas, This is interesting. I have some of the basic question about deployment model of using this BaGPipe BGP in virtual cloud network. 1. We want MPLS to start right from compute node as part Tennant traffic ? 2. We want L3

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-23 Thread Thomas Morin
: Thursday, June 19, 2014 9:32 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal Hi everyone, Sorry, I couldn't make it in time for the IRC meeting. Just saw in the logs: 15:19:12 yamamoto are orange folks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-23 Thread Thomas Morin
: Thursday, June 19, 2014 9:32 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal Hi everyone, Sorry, I couldn't make it in time for the IRC meeting. Just saw in the logs: 15:19:12 yamamoto are orange folks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-23 Thread Thomas Morin
Hi Ian, Ian Wells : When you say things like 'tenant = VRF' (and, in fact, I presume you mean 'network = VRF', since networks and tenants are two different things) then that's actually more to do with how you implement the networking overlay layer in Neutron. While interesting, and while

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-21 Thread A, Keshava
terminated ? Help me understand the deployment model for this . -Original Message- From: Thomas Morin [mailto:thomas.mo...@orange.com] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 9:32 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-19 Thread Thomas Morin
Hi everyone, Sorry, I couldn't make it in time for the IRC meeting. Just saw in the logs: 15:19:12 yamamoto are orange folks here? they might want to introduce their bgp speaker. The best intro to BaGPipe BGP is the README on github:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-16 Thread thomas.morin
Hi all, We've just released our implementation of BGP VPN extensions (called 'BaGPipe'), under a opensource license : https://github.com/Orange-OpenSource/bagpipe-bgp It reuses some code from ExaBGP, but with a dedicated engine for VPN instance creation through a rest API, and a modular

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-05 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
hi, ExaBgp was our first choice because we thought that run something in library mode would be much more easy to deal with (especially the exceptions and corner cases) and the code would be much cleaner. But seems that Ryu BGP also can fit in this requirement. And having the help from a Ryu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-05 Thread Yongsheng Gong
I think maybe we can device a kind of framework so that we can plugin different BGP speakers. On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:59 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi yamam...@valinux.co.jp wrote: hi, ExaBgp was our first choice because we thought that run something in library mode would be much more easy to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-05 Thread Nachi Ueno
Yamamoto Cool! OK, I'll make ryu based bgpspeaker as ref impl for my bp. Yong Ya, we have already decided to have the driver architecture. IMO, this discussion is for reference impl. 2014-06-05 0:24 GMT-07:00 Yongsheng Gong gong...@unitedstack.com: I think maybe we can device a kind of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-05 Thread Jaume Devesa
After watch the documentation and the code of *exabgp* and *Ryu*, I find the *Ryu* speaker much more easy to integrate and pythonic than *exabgp*. I will use it as well as reference implementation in the Dynamic Routing bp. Regards, On 5 June 2014 18:23, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-05 Thread Carl Baldwin
I have seen the Ryu team is involved and responsive to the community. That goes a long way to support it as the reference implementation for BPG speaking in Neutron. Thank you for your support. I'll look forward to the API and documentation refinement Let's be sure to document any work that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-05-31 Thread Ian Wells
I've tested exabgp against a v6 peer, and it's an independent feature, so I added that as a row separately from whether v6 advertisements work. Might be worth making the page general and adding in the vpn feature set too. On 30 May 2014 16:50, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi folks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-05-31 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
Hi folks ExaBGP won't suit for BGPVPN implementation because it isn't support vpnv4. Ryu is supporting it, however they have no internal api to binding neutron network route target. can you explain a little more? do you have api suggestions? YAMAMOTO Takashi so I think contrail is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-05-30 Thread Jaume Devesa
Hello Takashi, thanks for doing this! As we have proposed ExaBgp[1] in the Dynamic Routing blueprint[2], I've added a new column for this speaker in the wiki page. I plan to fill it soon. ExaBgp was our first choice because we thought that run something in library mode would be much more easy to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-05-30 Thread Mathieu Rohon
Hi, I was about mentionning ExaBGP too! can we also consider using those BGP speakers for BGPVPN implementation [1]. This would be consistent to have the same BGP speaker used for every BGP needs inside Neutron. [1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93329/ On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Jaume

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-05-30 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi folks ExaBGP won't suit for BGPVPN implementation because it isn't support vpnv4. Ryu is supporting it, however they have no internal api to binding neutron network route target. so I think contrail is a only solution for BGPVPN implementation now. 2014-05-30 2:22 GMT-07:00 Mathieu Rohon

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-05-29 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
as per discussions on l3 subteem meeting today, i started a bgp speakers comparison wiki page for this bp. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/BGPSpeakersComparison Artem, can you add other requirements as columns? as one of ryu developers, i'm naturally biased to ryu bgp. i appreciate if

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-04-28 Thread Artem Dmytrenko
Good afternoon Neutron developers! There has been a discussion about dynamic routing in Neutron for the past few weeks in the L3 subteam weekly meetings. I've submitted a review request of the blueprint documenting the proposal of this feature: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90833/. If you