Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-18 Thread Samuel Bercovici
] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 12:24 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy Folks, I wonder why using names on the backend could be needed? For the code there is no much difference between name

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-18 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Hi! On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.comwrote: Hi, It matters, as someone might need to “debug” the backend setup and the name, if exists, can add details. This obviously a vendor’s choice if they wish to push this back to backend but the API should

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-18 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi folks, I see little value in being able to debug such things because it is for developers only. However given that such choice doesn't affect workflow and public API, we can add corresponding calls to the driver API. Thanks, Eugene. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Stephen Balukoff

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-17 Thread Avishay Balderman
Hi L7Policy holds a list of L7rules plus 1 attribute: name . Questions: 1) Do we need to have this name attribute? 2) Do we want to allow update operation of the name attribute? Do we need to invoke the driver when such update occurred? Thanks Avishay

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-17 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Avishay, 1) I think name might be useful. Consider user forms a list of rules which route requests to a pool with static images or static pages, it may make sense to give those policy a name 'static-iamges', 'static-pages', rather then operate on ids. 2) I think updating the name is useful as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-17 Thread Oleg Bondarev
Hi, On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi Avishay, 1) I think name might be useful. Consider user forms a list of rules which route requests to a pool with static images or static pages, it may make sense to give those policy a name

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-17 Thread Samuel Bercovici
...@mirantis.com] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 11:30 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy Hi, On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.commailto:enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-17 Thread Avishay Balderman
this name to be static-images1 - why not to tell the driver about it? Thanks Avishay From: Oleg Bondarev [mailto:obonda...@mirantis.com] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 11:30 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-17 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy Hi, On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Avishay, 1) I think name might be useful. Consider user forms a list