Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values

2014-07-03 Thread Jorge Miramontes
Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 7:30 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values Making sure all drivers

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values

2014-07-03 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
@lists.openstack.org Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 7:30 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values Making sure all drivers support the features

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values

2014-07-03 Thread Jorge Miramontes
: Thursday, July 3, 2014 3:30 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values I also don't think it is fair

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values

2014-06-24 Thread Avishay Balderman
Hi One of L7 Rule attributes is ‘compare_type’. This field is the match operator that the rule should activate against the value found in the request. Below is list of the possible values: - Regexp - StartsWith - EndsWith - Contains - EqualTo (*) - GreaterThan (*) - LessThan (*) The last 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values

2014-06-24 Thread Dustin Lundquist
I think the API should provide an richly featured interface, and individual drivers should indicate if they support the provided configuration. For example there is a spec for a Linux LVS LBaaS driver, this driver would not support TLS termination or any layer 7 features, but would still be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values

2014-06-24 Thread Avishay Balderman
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values I think the API should provide an richly featured interface, and individual drivers should indicate if they support the provided configuration

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values

2014-06-24 Thread Dustin Lundquist
be fully compatible with the interface it implements. Avishay *From:* Dustin Lundquist [mailto:dus...@null-ptr.net] *Sent:* Tuesday, June 24, 2014 5:41 PM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values

2014-06-24 Thread Stephen Balukoff
with the interface it implements. Avishay *From:* Dustin Lundquist [mailto:dus...@null-ptr.net] *Sent:* Tuesday, June 24, 2014 5:41 PM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule - comapre_type values