Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting
Hi, Sure they must have the same provider. Loadbalancer instance could be created in two ways: - implicitly with pool creation, then provider for the pool becomes provider for the instance. - explicitly, with pool created later on and attached to the instance. In that case provider attribute will be validated against instance's provider. Thanks, Eugene. On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp wrote: Hi Eugene, Iwamoto You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API compatibility reasons. I agree with you. I just wanted to make sure pools in a loadblancer can have different providers or not. (I think it should be same.) Thanks Itsuto Ofa On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:48:30 +0400 Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Iwamoto, You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API compatibility reasons. Thanks, Eugene. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:35 AM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro iwam...@valinux.co.jp wrote: At Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:25:54 +0900, Itsuro ODA wrote: Hi Eugene, Thank you for the response. I have a comment. I think 'provider' attribute should be added to loadbalance resource and used rather than pool's 'provider' since I think using multiple driver within a loadbalancer does not make sense. There can be a 'provider' attribute in a loadbalancer resource, but, to maintain API, the 'provider' attribute in pools should remain the same. Is there any other attribute planned for the loadbalancer resource? What do you think ? I'm looking forward to your code up ! Thanks. Itsuro Oda On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:58:40 +0400 Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Itsuro, I've updated the wiki with some examples of cli workflow that illustrate proposed API. Please see the updated page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance#API_change Thanks, Eugene. -- IWAMOTO Toshihiro ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting
Hi Eugene, Iwamoto You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API compatibility reasons. I agree with you. I just wanted to make sure pools in a loadblancer can have different providers or not. (I think it should be same.) Thanks Itsuto Ofa On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:48:30 +0400 Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Iwamoto, You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API compatibility reasons. Thanks, Eugene. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:35 AM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro iwam...@valinux.co.jpwrote: At Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:25:54 +0900, Itsuro ODA wrote: Hi Eugene, Thank you for the response. I have a comment. I think 'provider' attribute should be added to loadbalance resource and used rather than pool's 'provider' since I think using multiple driver within a loadbalancer does not make sense. There can be a 'provider' attribute in a loadbalancer resource, but, to maintain API, the 'provider' attribute in pools should remain the same. Is there any other attribute planned for the loadbalancer resource? What do you think ? I'm looking forward to your code up ! Thanks. Itsuro Oda On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:58:40 +0400 Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Itsuro, I've updated the wiki with some examples of cli workflow that illustrate proposed API. Please see the updated page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance#API_change Thanks, Eugene. -- IWAMOTO Toshihiro ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting
At Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:25:54 +0900, Itsuro ODA wrote: Hi Eugene, Thank you for the response. I have a comment. I think 'provider' attribute should be added to loadbalance resource and used rather than pool's 'provider' since I think using multiple driver within a loadbalancer does not make sense. There can be a 'provider' attribute in a loadbalancer resource, but, to maintain API, the 'provider' attribute in pools should remain the same. Is there any other attribute planned for the loadbalancer resource? What do you think ? I'm looking forward to your code up ! Thanks. Itsuro Oda On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:58:40 +0400 Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Itsuro, I've updated the wiki with some examples of cli workflow that illustrate proposed API. Please see the updated page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance#API_change Thanks, Eugene. -- IWAMOTO Toshihiro ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting
Hi Itsuro, I've updated the wiki with some examples of cli workflow that illustrate proposed API. Please see the updated page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance#API_change Thanks, Eugene. On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp wrote: Hi, I'd like to review about LoadblancerInstance API specification. Please update wiki page before the meeting. (It is a little bit hard to follow in the IRC for me since I'm not English native. so I'd like to consider for the API beforehand.) Thanks. Itsuro Oda On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:07:47 +0400 Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Neutron folks, LBaaS subteam meeting will be on Thursday, 27, at 14-00 UTC as usual. We'll discuss current progress and continue with feature design. Thanks, Eugene. -- Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting
Hi Eugene, Thank you for the response. I have a comment. I think 'provider' attribute should be added to loadbalance resource and used rather than pool's 'provider' since I think using multiple driver within a loadbalancer does not make sense. What do you think ? I'm looking forward to your code up ! Thanks. Itsuro Oda On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:58:40 +0400 Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Itsuro, I've updated the wiki with some examples of cli workflow that illustrate proposed API. Please see the updated page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance#API_change Thanks, Eugene. On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp wrote: Hi, I'd like to review about LoadblancerInstance API specification. Please update wiki page before the meeting. (It is a little bit hard to follow in the IRC for me since I'm not English native. so I'd like to consider for the API beforehand.) Thanks. Itsuro Oda On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:07:47 +0400 Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Neutron folks, LBaaS subteam meeting will be on Thursday, 27, at 14-00 UTC as usual. We'll discuss current progress and continue with feature design. Thanks, Eugene. -- Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting
Hi, I can't find the 28th meeting log. (Does not logs automatically generated ?) Thanks. -- Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting
Hi, I found it in /meeting/nuetron_lbaas. (neutron - nuetron) On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:51:56 +0900 Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp wrote: Hi, I can't find the 28th meeting log. (Does not logs automatically generated ?) Thanks. -- Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting
Hi Neutron folks, LBaaS subteam meeting will be on Thursday, 27, at 14-00 UTC as usual. We'll discuss current progress and continue with feature design. Thanks, Eugene. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting
Hi, I'd like to review about LoadblancerInstance API specification. Please update wiki page before the meeting. (It is a little bit hard to follow in the IRC for me since I'm not English native. so I'd like to consider for the API beforehand.) Thanks. Itsuro Oda On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:07:47 +0400 Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Neutron folks, LBaaS subteam meeting will be on Thursday, 27, at 14-00 UTC as usual. We'll discuss current progress and continue with feature design. Thanks, Eugene. -- Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
