In the context of Octavia and Neutron LBaaS. Susanne
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Susanne,
Are you asking in the context of Load Balancer services in general, or in
terms of the Neutron LBaaS project or the Octavia project?
Stephen
On
From the perspective of Blue Box:
* Load balancing appliances will often (usually?) live outside the same
subnet as back-end member VMs.
* The network in which the load balancing appliances live will usually have
a default router (gateway)
* We don't anticipate the need for using extra_routes at
Gang,
I was asked the following questions around our Neutron LBaaS use cases:
1. Will there be a scenario where the “VIP” port will be in a different
Node, from all the Member “VMs” in a pool.
2. Also how likely is it for the LBaaS configured subnet to not have a
“router” and just use the
Hi Susanne,
While there are a few operators involved with LBaaS that would have good
input, you might want to also ask this on the non-dev mailing list, for a
larger sample size.
Thanks,
doug
On 8/11/14, 3:05 AM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote:
Gang,
I was asked the following
Susanne,
Are you asking in the context of Load Balancer services in general, or in
terms of the Neutron LBaaS project or the Octavia project?
Stephen
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Doug Wiegley do...@a10networks.com wrote:
Hi Susanne,
While there are a few operators involved with LBaaS
