Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are we ready?

2016-03-08 Thread Clint Byrum 
Excerpts from Samuel Bercovici's message of 2016-03-02 07:06:30 -0800:
> 2.  HEAT Support - will it be ready in Mitaka?

Side note, please remember, Heat is not an acronym.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are we ready?

2016-03-02 Thread Justin Pomeroy 
As for the horizon support, much of it will make Mitaka.  See the 
blueprint and gerrit topic:


https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/horizon-lbaas-v2-ui
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/horizon-lbaas-v2-ui,n,z

- Justin

On 3/2/16 9:22 AM, Doug Wiegley wrote:

Hi,

A few things:

- It’s not proposed for removal in Mitaka. That patch is for Newton.
- HEAT and Horizon are planned for Mitaka (see neutron-lbaas-dashboard 
for the latter.)
- I don’t view this as a “keep or delete” question. If sufficient 
folks are interested in maintaining it, there is a third option, which 
is that the code can be maintained in a separate repo, by a separate 
team (with or without the current core team’s blessing.)


No decisions have been made yet, but we are on the cusp of some major 
maintenance changes, and two deprecation cycles have passed. Which 
path forward is being discussed at today’s Octavia meeting, or 
feedback is of course welcomed here, in IRC, or anywhere.


Thanks,
doug

On Mar 2, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Samuel Bercovici > wrote:


Hi,
I have just notices the following 
change:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286381which aims to remove 
LBaaS v1.

Is this planned for Mitaka or forNewton?
While LBaaS v2 is becoming the default, I think that we should have 
the following before we replace LBaaS v1:

1.Horizon Support – was not able to find any real activity on it
2.HEAT Support – will it be ready in Mitaka?
Do you have any other items that are needed before we get rid of 
LBaaS v1?

-Sam.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org 
?subject:unsubscribe

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are we ready?

2016-03-02 Thread Doug Wiegley 
Hi,

A few things:

- It’s not proposed for removal in Mitaka. That patch is for Newton.
- HEAT and Horizon are planned for Mitaka (see neutron-lbaas-dashboard for the 
latter.)
- I don’t view this as a “keep or delete” question. If sufficient folks are 
interested in maintaining it, there is a third option, which is that the code 
can be maintained in a separate repo, by a separate team (with or without the 
current core team’s blessing.)

No decisions have been made yet, but we are on the cusp of some major 
maintenance changes, and two deprecation cycles have passed. Which path forward 
is being discussed at today’s Octavia meeting, or feedback is of course 
welcomed here, in IRC, or anywhere.

Thanks,
doug

> On Mar 2, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Samuel Bercovici  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
>  
> I have just notices the following change: 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286381 
>  which aims to remove LBaaS v1.
> Is this planned for Mitaka or for Newton?
>  
> While LBaaS v2 is becoming the default, I think that we should have the 
> following before we replace LBaaS v1:
> 1.  Horizon Support – was not able to find any real activity on it
> 2.  HEAT Support – will it be ready in Mitaka?
>  
> Do you have any other items that are needed before we get rid of LBaaS v1?
>  
> -Sam.
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org 
> ?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> 
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are we ready?

2016-03-02 Thread Samuel Bercovici 
Hi,

I have just notices the following change: 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286381 which aims to remove LBaaS v1.
Is this planned for Mitaka or for Newton?

While LBaaS v2 is becoming the default, I think that we should have the 
following before we replace LBaaS v1:

1.  Horizon Support - was not able to find any real activity on it

2.  HEAT Support - will it be ready in Mitaka?

Do you have any other items that are needed before we get rid of LBaaS v1?

-Sam.







__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev