Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver

2015-08-22 Thread Kevin Benton
I am in favor not to go for a least common denominator approach with the bgpvpn API. The API should cover the use case commonly acknowledged as useful and which are supported by at least one of the existing back-ends, with the aim to have various back-ends to grow in support coverage. So then

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver

2015-08-21 Thread Jan Scheurich
Hi all, I am in favor not to go for a least common denominator approach with the bgpvpn API. The API should cover the use case commonly acknowledged as useful and which are supported by at least one of the existing back-ends, with the aim to have various back-ends to grow in support coverage.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver

2015-08-19 Thread Mathieu Rohon
-- *From:* Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com *Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:13 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver Adding the related subject :) On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mathieu Rohon

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver

2015-08-19 Thread Irena Berezovsky
mathieu.ro...@gmail.com *Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:13 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver Adding the related subject :) On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver

2015-08-19 Thread Salvatore Orlando
less. thanks brandon. Mathieu Thanks, Brandon -- *From:* Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com *Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:13 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver

2015-08-18 Thread Mathieu Rohon
Adding the related subject :) On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, The current bgpvpn implementation is using the service type framework, with a service plugin and one or more service providers. After registering the bug [1], I wonder if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver

2015-08-18 Thread Brandon Logan
: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:13 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver Adding the related subject :) On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.commailto:mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver

2015-08-18 Thread Mathieu Rohon
service plugins, but probably less. thanks brandon. Mathieu Thanks, Brandon -- *From:* Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com *Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:13 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin