Hi L2GWers,
Eventhough this is a project with few active contributors, these are our
goals for Rocky release:
- OpenStack client migration
- Out-of-sync DB common effort (together with networking-odl,
networking-ovn, etc.)
- Broad CI jobs scenarios (adding a HWVTEP emultator)
- Ad
Thanks!! When its ready we can add it again.
Thank you!
From: Emilien Macchi
Reply-To: OpenStack List
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 9:14 AM
To: OpenStack List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] stable/queens tripleo issues
Hey Gary :-)
Yeah our CI isn't ready yet for s
Hey Gary :-)
Yeah our CI isn't ready yet for stable/queens, sorry for that.
I propose to disable TripleO jobs in stable/queens for l2gw project:
https://review.openstack.org/546059
Hopefully that helps!
Cheers,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment the s
Hi,
At the moment the stable/queens branch is broken due to the tripleo CI test
failing [i]. Does anyone have any hints here on what we should look at? I am
not sure if this is with ansible/centos…
Thanks
Gary
[i]
http://logs.openstack.org/88/543188/2/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario004-multin
Just for awareness on this subject. Peng has proposed an initial patch to
tackle this issue:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529009/6
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto <
rnori...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Peng, I think you are right. We should have a common behavior among t
Peng, I think you are right. We should have a common behavior among the
drivers, and move the implementation to the proper methods like
post-commits, do the validation on the pre-commits, etc, etc.
Second phase to tackle the out-of-sync could be the "revision number"
approach from networking-ovn.
Hi Michael,
Yes, it's a similar issue but different aspect. Actually, the case for l2gw
is worse, considering we have to deal with 2 existing back-end driver which
have different understanding for the interfaces. But I think the proposed
approach for networking-ovn is inspiring and helpful for l2g
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Peng Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During working on this patch[0], I encounter some DB out-of-sync problem. I
> think maybe the design can be improved. Here is my thought, all comments are
> welcome.
see also https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490834/ which I think is
deali
Hi,
During working on this patch[0], I encounter some DB out-of-sync problem. I
think maybe the design can be improved. Here is my thought, all comments
are welcome.
In plugin code, I found all the resource operations follow the pattern in
[1]. It is a very misleading design compare to [2].
"For
It may be a non-negligible effort to make ovs containerized in the
namespace in the first place (that's one of the things we still miss
in fullstack in neutron repo). I know that Terry Wilson had some code
for that, but I can't find it right now.
Ihar
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Ricardo Norie
The idea for the future is to enable a new job with the l2gw agent enabled.
In order to do that, I thought about creating a network namespace running
an OVS instance with the hwvtep schema so the l2gw agent can connect to it.
This is just a first rough idea and I haven't tested anything.
Do you ha
Plan sounds fine. Those interested in ovs backend may build on top,
but at least laying basic api coverage with a fake/dummy driver is a
must for a service plugin project that is serious about integration
with Neutron.
Ihar
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto
wrote:
> Hello
Hello,
The dummy driver allows you to make writes/reads from the database and
that's something we should be continuously testing. I think you cannot
achieve that mocking the API calls.
Cheers
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Mellado wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> That sounds like a totally v
Hi Ricardo,
That sounds like a totally valid approach to me, but I was wondering if
there'd be a way to mock that API call. If just using the dummy driver
would achieve that then I'd be more than happy to see that modification.
Cheers!
Daniel
El 15/06/17 a las 06:38, Ricardo Noriega De Soto esc
Hello L2GWers
Currently networking-l2gw CI only covers unit tests. However, there is an
experimental check that starts a devstack VM to be able to run more complex
tests. That experimental check is not working, and we are trying to fix it,
however we encountered some difficulties that we wanted to
Hi Kevin,
There was already a bug filed about the Tempest plugin:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-l2gw/+bug/1692529
Thanks
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> Can you file a bug against Neutron and reference it here?
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Ricardo Noriega
Can you file a bug against Neutron and reference it here?
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto wrote:
> There is actually a bunch of patches waiting to be reviewed and approved.
>
> Please, we'd need core reviewers to jump in.
>
> I'd like to thank Gary for all his support and
There is actually a bunch of patches waiting to be reviewed and approved.
Please, we'd need core reviewers to jump in.
I'd like to thank Gary for all his support and reviews.
Thanks Gary!
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please note that the L2 GW code is currentl
Hi,
Please note that the L2 GW code is currently broken due to the commit
e6333593ae6005c4b0d73d9dfda5eb47f40dd8da
If someone has the cycles can they please take a look.
Thanks
gary
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not f
Hi,
Are there any plans to cut a stable/newton branch here?
Thanks
Gary
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.ope
Hi,
I want to connect VXLAN segments to VLAN segments using a L2GW, and
I want the L2GW to be redundant which is achieved by two or more
baremetals.
Is there some ideas for that? Or should I use STP/RSTP on OpenvSwitches?
Regard,
Eigo
_
Folks,
I am pleased to announce the addition of Ofer Ben-Yakov as new core team
member of L2 Gateway team.
Ofer has been working hard and contributing to solidify L2GW framework as
well adding new features to the L2GW.
The team welcomes Ofer on board and look forward to work with him.
Thanks a
-
From: Sean M. Collins [mailto:s...@coreitpro.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 11:06 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW][Tricircle]Border Gateway support
joehuang wrote:
> And one session[3] in Austin summit called
joehuang wrote:
> And one session[3] in Austin summit called for action in the community to
> prioritize and accelerate Tricircle development.
>
> [1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270786/
> [2]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304540/
> [3]https://www.openstack.org/videos/video/distributed-nfv-
Thanks a lot.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: Sukhdev Kapur [mailto:sukhdevka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 4:06 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: armando.migliac...@hp.com
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2
Hi Martinx,
L2GW is designed to bridge neutron networks with non-neutron networks to
form a L2 broadcast domain - not two neutron networks.
regards..
-Sukhdev
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ
wrote:
>
>
> On 11 May 2016 at 16:05, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
>
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I a
On 11 May 2016 at 16:05, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released and
> now available at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw.
>
> You can install it by using "pip install networking-l2gw"
>
> This release has several enhanc
On 16 May 2016 at 05:15, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> > On 11 May 2016, at 22:05, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
> >
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released
> and now available at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw.
> >
> > You can install it by
> On 11 May 2016, at 22:05, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
>
>
> Folks,
>
> I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released and now
> available at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw.
>
> You can install it by using "pip install networking-l2gw"
>
> This release has se
Can you move this documentation to the networking guide where
operators/users can locate it more easily?
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Sukhdev Kapur
wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> If you look through the documentation, there are steps described to
> install L2GW outside of devstack.
>
> -Sukhdev
>
>
>
Hi Matt,
If you look through the documentation, there are steps described to install
L2GW outside of devstack.
-Sukhdev
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Matt Kassawara
wrote:
> Do you have any examples of how to implement L2GW outside of DevStack?
> Operators do not deploy on DevStack.
>
> On
Do you have any examples of how to implement L2GW outside of DevStack?
Operators do not deploy on DevStack.
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Sukhdev Kapur
wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
>
> Here is the wiki - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/L2-GW
>
> This should provide you all the information that
Hi Matt,
Here is the wiki - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/L2-GW
This should provide you all the information that you need.
-Sukhdev
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Matt Kassawara
wrote:
> Can you point me to the documentation?
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Sukhdev Kapur
Can you point me to the documentation?
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Sukhdev Kapur
wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released and
> now available at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw.
>
> You can install it by using "pip install netw
Folks,
I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released and
now available at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw.
You can install it by using "pip install networking-l2gw"
This release has several enhancements and fixes for issues discovered in
liberty release.
Tha
Yes, I am on it. I was waiting for a Green Light from few folks, which I
got this morning.
So, I will be working on releasing it sometime tomorrow.
Hope that is OK with everybody.
-Sukhdev
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 9 May 2016 at 18:03, Gary Kotton wrote:
>
>>
On 9 May 2016 at 18:03, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> Are there plans to cut a a stable/mitaka version for the l2gw?
> https://github.com/openstack/networking-l2gw
> Thanks
> Gary
>
I know Sukhdev was working on it.
>
> __
>
Good catch!
Cheers,
S
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> Are there plans to cut a a stable/mitaka version for the l2gw?
> https://github.com/openstack/networking-l2gw
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> __
> OpenSt
Hi,
Are there plans to cut a a stable/mitaka version for the l2gw?
https://github.com/openstack/networking-l2gw
Thanks
Gary
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lis
39 matches
Mail list logo