Hi Paul
Sorry, I have missed this mail.
The reason for putting -1 was the gating issue, so it is OK now.
PS
Thank you for your rebasing this one
2014-02-16 16:43 GMT-08:00 Sumit Naiksatam :
> Hi Paul,
>
> Our plan with FWaaS was to get it to parity with LBaaS as far as STF
> is concerned. That w
Hi Paul,
Our plan with FWaaS was to get it to parity with LBaaS as far as STF
is concerned. That way any changes to STF can be explored in the
context of all services, and the migration can also be performed for
all services. Accordingly, Gary Duan has been actively working on the
patch:
https://r
Hi Nachi and other cores!
I'm very close to publishing my vendor based VPNaaS driver (service driver is
ready, device driver is a day or two out), but have a bit of an issue. This
code uses the Service Type Framework, which, as you know, is still out for
review (and has been idle for a long tim
