Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

.com>; b...@ovn.org Cc: Jesse Gross <je...@kernel.org>; Jiri Benc <jb...@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC Few comments below Thx Uri ("Oo-Ree") C: 949-378-7568 -Original Message- From: Yang, Yi Y [mailto:yi.y.y...@intel.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>; b...@ovn.org Cc: Jesse Gross <je...@kernel.org>; Jiri Benc <jb...@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC Also cc to Jiri and Jesse, I think mandatory L3 requirement is not reasonable for tunnel port, say

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC I'm probably the wrong person to give advice on kernel development, since I haven't been involved in it for years. I just know that it's difficult, and not always because of th

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Message- From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:48 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:08:23AM +, Yang, Yi Y wrote: > Ben, yes, we submi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:08:23AM +, Yang, Yi Y wrote: > > Ben, yes, we submitted nsh support patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

6 11:54 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>; b...@ovn.org; Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC Looks like the work of removing the mandatory L3

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

9-378-7568 -Original Message- From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:48 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC On Wed, Ju

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

t: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:48 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:08:23AM +, Yang, Yi Y wrote: > Ben, yes, we submitted nsh support patch set last year, but ovs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:08:23AM +, Yang, Yi Y wrote: > Ben, yes, we submitted nsh support patch set last year, but ovs > community told me we have to push kernel part into Linux kernel tree, > we're struggling to do this, but something blocked us from doing this. It's quite difficult to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

this. -Original Message- From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 10:38 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC On Mon,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

k Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 10:12:34 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC On 5/25/2016 13:24, Tim Rozet wrote: > In my opinion, it is a better approach to break

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:12:34PM -0400, Paul Carver wrote: > I don't know the details of why OvS hasn't added NSH support so I can't > judge the validity of the concerns, but one way or another there has to be a > production-quality dataplane for networking-sfc to front-end. It looks like the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

iling List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC On 5/25/2016 13:24, Tim Rozet wrote: > In my opinion, it is a better approach to break this down into plugin vs > driver support. There shoul

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

On 5/25/2016 13:24, Tim Rozet wrote: In my opinion, it is a better approach to break this down into plugin vs driver support. There should be no problem adding support into networking-sfc plugin for NSH today. The OVS driver however, depends on OVS as the dataplane - which I can see a solid

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

, Igor. From: Elzur, Uri [mailto:uri.el...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 8:38 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC Hi Armando I hear (hop

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC On 25 May 2016 at 12:29, Elzur, Uri <uri.el...@intel.com<mailto:uri.el...@intel.com>> wrote: Armando I’m asking for a clear answer “I think the position

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

gt;> The IETF is already last call and open source support ??? >> >> Thx >> >> Uri (“Oo-Ree”) >> C: 949-378-7568 >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 1:00

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

nesday, May 25, 2016 1:00 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Elzur, Uri <uri.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

> > Thx > > > > Uri (“Oo-Ree”) > > C: 949-378-7568 > > > > *From:* Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 25, 2016 9:33 AM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

ogy stack options we > can rely on in order to realize abstractions so long as they are open, and > have a viable future. > > > > > > Thx > > > > Uri (“Oo-Ree”) > > C: 949-378-7568 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Tim Rozet [m

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

ailto:arma...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 9:33 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC > > > > > > > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:06 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC On 24 May 2016 at 22:07, Elzur, Uri &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC In my opinion, it is a better approach to break this down into plugin vs driver support. There should be no problem adding support into net

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>; Elzur, Uri <uri.el...@intel.com<mailto:uri.el...@intel.com>> Cc: Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com<mailto:cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com>> Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

y, May 20, 2016 9:08 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC > > > > > > > > On 20 May 2016 at 17:37, Elzur, Uri &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

ndo M." <arma...@gmail.com> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Cc: "Tim Rozet" <tro...@redhat.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 12:33:16 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

ilto:tro...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 7:01 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>; Elzur, Uri <uri.el...@intel.com> > Cc: Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> > Subject: Re: [openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

uawei.com<mailto:cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com>> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC On 13 May 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

ck.org>; Elzur, Uri <uri.el...@intel.com> Cc: Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC Hi Uri, I originally wrote the Tacker->ODL SFC NSH piece and have been working with Tacker and networking-sfc team to bring it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

8-7568 > > > > *From:* Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, May 13, 2016 5:14 PM > *To:* Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> > *Cc:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Subject:* Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

C: 949-378-7568 From: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 5:14 PM To: Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] supp

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

, 2016 5:14 PM To: Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC On 13 May 2016 at 16:01, Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.z

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

...@huawei.com] Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 1:10 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC Hi Uri, I hope all the replies have helped answer your qu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

nd if someone wants to write a networking-sfc driver for it, that code would be welcomed. Thanks, Cathy -Original Message- From: Paul Carver [mailto:pcar...@paulcarver.us] Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 7:25 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:13:59 -0700 "Armando M." wrote: > On 13 May 2016 at 16:10, Elzur, Uri wrote: > > > Hi Cathy > > > > > > > > Thank you for the quick response. This is the essence of my > > question – does Neutron keep OvS as a gold standard and why

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

13, 2016 3:02 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); > Armando M > *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC > > > > Hi Armando > > > > As an industry we are working on SFC for 3 years or so (more?). Still to >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

568 > > > > *From:* Cathy Zhang [mailto:cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com] > *Sent:* Friday, May 13, 2016 4:02 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>; Armando M <arma...@gmail.com> > *Subject:* Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

On 13 May 2016 at 15:02, Elzur, Uri wrote: > Hi Armando > > > > As an industry we are working on SFC for 3 years or so (more?). Still to > date, we are told we can’t get Neutron or even a Stadium project e.g. > networking-SFC to support NSH (in IETF LC phase) because OvS has

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

, 2016 4:02 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>; Armando M <arma...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC Hi Uri, Current networking-sfc API allows the user to specify the d

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

questions); Armando M Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC Hi Armando As an industry we are working on SFC for 3 years or so (more?). Still to date, we are told we can’t get Neutron or even a Stadium project e.g. networking-SFC to support NSH (in IETF LC phase

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Hi Armando As an industry we are working on SFC for 3 years or so (more?). Still to date, we are told we can’t get Neutron or even a Stadium project e.g. networking-SFC to support NSH (in IETF LC phase) because OvS has not supported NSH. Is this an official position of Neutron that OvS is the