On 10/23/2014 07:57 PM, Elzur, Uri wrote:
We’d like to bring it up in the coming design summit. Where do you think
it needs to be discussed: cross project tack? Scheduler discussion? Other?
I’ve just added a proposed item 17.1 to the
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-summit-topi
Damn, there are multiple discussions on scheduler split while I'm on
vacation, thus I can't correctly respond the best I would...
Le 24 oct. 2014 03:11, "Jay Pipes" a écrit :
>
> On 10/23/2014 07:57 PM, Elzur, Uri wrote:
>>
>> Today, OpenStack makes placement decision mainly based on Compute
>> d
On 10/23/2014 07:57 PM, Elzur, Uri wrote:
Today, OpenStack makes placement decision mainly based on Compute
demands (Scheduler is part of Nova). It also uses some info provided
about platform’s Compute capabilities. But for a given application
(consists of some VMs, some Network appliances, some
Today, OpenStack makes placement decision mainly based on Compute demands
(Scheduler is part of Nova). It also uses some info provided about platform's
Compute capabilities. But for a given application (consists of some VMs, some
Network appliances, some storage etc), Nova/Scheduler has no way t
