Hi,
I guess, the splitting point is defined by the hypervisor, so I guess
that's a +1 for the config option. Does any other hypervisor have such a
limit? If so, it would make sense to set it to the minimum of all those
limits.
Mate
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:02:44PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote:
On 06/21/2013 05:55 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
Its just that the limit you want to set varies depending on the
flavor. So flavor = 10TB, limit = 2000GB, the final disk is a bit of
an odd size, maybe 1024GB would be a better split.
Although you make a good point, maybe we should set the
So in the current review, I have just gone for switching between
2000GB and 1024 GB.
I figure we can try this simpler approach, and worry about
generalizing it if people need it later.
John
On 24 June 2013 16:13, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/21/2013 05:55 AM, John Garbutt
Hi,
I have had some discussions about if I should add a config flag in this change:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32760/
I am looking to support adding a large amount of ephemeral disk space
to a VM, but the VHD format has a limit of around 2TB per disk. To
work around this in XenServer, I