-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 25 November 2013 22:37
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hypervisor CI requirement and
deprecation plan
On 11/25/2013 05:19 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I'll play
On 11/25/2013 08:00 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On Monday, November 25, 2013 4:37:29 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
I think the short answer is, whatever we're running against all Nova
changes in the gate.
Maybe a silly question, but is what is run against the check queue any
different from the
On 11/26/2013 04:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 25 November 2013 22:37
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hypervisor CI requirement and
deprecation plan
On 11/25/2013 05:19 PM
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 26 November 2013 13:56
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Sean Dague
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hypervisor CI requirement and
deprecation plan
On 11/26/2013 04:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
I
On 11/26/2013 09:38 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 26 November 2013 13:56
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Sean Dague
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hypervisor CI requirement and
deprecation plan
On 11/26
: Sean Dague
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hypervisor CI requirement and
deprecation plan
On 11/26/2013 04:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
I hope we can safely say that we should run against all gating tests which
require Nova? Currently we run quite a number of tests in the gate that
succeed even
My overall concern, and I think the other guys doing this for virt
drivers will agree, is trying to scope down the exposure to unrelated
failures.
But, if it's not related to your driver, then it also failed in the
upstream gate, right? If it didn't fail the upstream gate, then it is
some
On 11/15/2013 9:28 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
Hi all,
As you know, Nova adopted a plan to require CI testing for all our
in-tree hypervisors by the Icehouse release. At the summit last week, we
determined the actual plan for deprecating non-compliant drivers. I put
together a page detailing the
On 11/25/2013 05:19 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I'll play devil's advocate here and ask this question before someone
else does. I'm assuming that the requirement of a 'full' tempest run
means running this [1]. Is that correct? It's just confusing sometimes
because there are other things in
On Monday, November 25, 2013 4:37:29 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/25/2013 05:19 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I'll play devil's advocate here and ask this question before someone
else does. I'm assuming that the requirement of a 'full' tempest run
means running this [1]. Is that correct?
On Sat 16 Nov 2013 (17:43), Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/16/2013 11:18 AM, Álvaro López García wrote:
On Fri 15 Nov 2013 (07:28), Dan Smith wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Dan.
As you know, Nova adopted a plan to require CI testing for all our
in-tree hypervisors by the Icehouse release. At the
On 11/18/2013 09:55 AM, Álvaro López García wrote:
On Sat 16 Nov 2013 (17:43), Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/16/2013 11:18 AM, Álvaro López García wrote:
On Fri 15 Nov 2013 (07:28), Dan Smith wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Dan.
As you know, Nova adopted a plan to require CI testing for all our
in-tree
On Fri 15 Nov 2013 (07:28), Dan Smith wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Dan.
As you know, Nova adopted a plan to require CI testing for all our
in-tree hypervisors by the Icehouse release. At the summit last week, we
determined the actual plan for deprecating non-compliant drivers. I put
together a page
On 11/16/2013 11:18 AM, Álvaro López García wrote:
On Fri 15 Nov 2013 (07:28), Dan Smith wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Dan.
As you know, Nova adopted a plan to require CI testing for all our
in-tree hypervisors by the Icehouse release. At the summit last week, we
determined the actual plan for
Hi all,
As you know, Nova adopted a plan to require CI testing for all our
in-tree hypervisors by the Icehouse release. At the summit last week, we
determined the actual plan for deprecating non-compliant drivers. I put
together a page detailing the specific requirements we're putting in
place as
15 matches
Mail list logo
