On 08/29/2016 05:53 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
Personally I believe the cat is out of the bag on bdms overriding
flavors and we should just commit to that path and make it work well.
And for deployers who rely on flavors being the source of truth maybe we
provide them a policy check or some other
> -Original Message-
> From: Sylvain Bauza [mailto:sba...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 2:43 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) d...@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Reconciling flavors and block
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, at 08:42 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>
>
> Le 29/08/2016 14:20, Jay Pipes a écrit :
> > On 08/29/2016 05:11 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> >> Le 29/08/2016 13:25, Jay Pipes a écrit :
> >>> On 08/26/2016 09:20 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Laski
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, at 07:25 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 08/26/2016 09:20 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> > On Aug 25, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
> >
> >> One other thing to note is that while a flavor constrains how much local
> >> disk is used it does not constrain volume
Le 29/08/2016 14:43, Andrew Laski a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, at 08:20 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/29/2016 05:11 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Le 29/08/2016 13:25, Jay Pipes a écrit :
On 08/26/2016 09:20 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Aug 25, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Laski
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, at 08:20 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 08/29/2016 05:11 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> > Le 29/08/2016 13:25, Jay Pipes a écrit :
> >> On 08/26/2016 09:20 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> >>> On Aug 25, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
> >>>
> One other thing to
Le 29/08/2016 14:20, Jay Pipes a écrit :
On 08/29/2016 05:11 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Le 29/08/2016 13:25, Jay Pipes a écrit :
On 08/26/2016 09:20 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Aug 25, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
One other thing to note is that while a flavor
On 08/29/2016 05:11 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Le 29/08/2016 13:25, Jay Pipes a écrit :
On 08/26/2016 09:20 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Aug 25, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
One other thing to note is that while a flavor constrains how much
local
disk is used it does not
Le 29/08/2016 13:25, Jay Pipes a écrit :
On 08/26/2016 09:20 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Aug 25, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
One other thing to note is that while a flavor constrains how much
local
disk is used it does not constrain volume size at all. So a user
On 08/26/2016 09:20 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Aug 25, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
One other thing to note is that while a flavor constrains how much local
disk is used it does not constrain volume size at all. So a user can
specify an ephemeral/swap disk <= to what
Le 26/08/2016 12:33, Chris Dent a écrit :
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Of course, long-term, we could try to see how to have composite
flavors for helping users to not create a whole handful of flavors
for quite the same user requests, but that would still be flavors (or
the
From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griffi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 10:21 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Reconciling flavors and block device
mappings
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Ed Leafe
&l
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>
> > One other thing to note is that while a flavor constrains how much local
> > disk is used it does not constrain volume size at all. So a user can
> >
On Aug 25, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
> One other thing to note is that while a flavor constrains how much local
> disk is used it does not constrain volume size at all. So a user can
> specify an ephemeral/swap disk <= to what the flavor provides but can
> have an
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Of course, long-term, we could try to see how to have composite flavors for
helping users to not create a whole handful of flavors for quite the same
user requests, but that would still be flavors (or the name for saying a
flavor composition).
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Andrew Laski wrote:
Allow block device mappings, when present, to mostly determine instance
packing. By that I mean that the scheduler only takes into account local
disk that would be consumed, but we add additional configuration to Nova
which limits the number of instance
Le 25/08/2016 16:19, Andrew Laski a écrit :
Cross posting to gather some operator feedback.
There have been a couple of contentious patches gathering attention
recently about how to handle the case where a block device mapping
supersedes flavor information. Before moving forward on either of
Cross posting to gather some operator feedback.
There have been a couple of contentious patches gathering attention
recently about how to handle the case where a block device mapping
supersedes flavor information. Before moving forward on either of those
I think we should have a discussion about
18 matches
Mail list logo