m: David Ripton [mailto:drip...@redhat.com]
> > > Sent: 16 July 2013 15:39
> > > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Seperate out 'soft-deleted'
> instances from
> > > 'deleted' ones?
&g
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Ripton [mailto:drip...@redhat.com]
> > Sent: 16 July 2013 15:39
> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Seperate out 'soft-deleted' instances
> > from
> > &
> > I'd like to see if there are any opinions on if this should come
> > back as 'SOFT_DELETED' or if everyone is OK with mapping
> > soft-delete to 'DELETED' in the v3 API?
>
> I would like to see them merged. Having multiple kinds of deleted
> records is really confusing, and leads to bugs. T
On 07/16/2013 10:38 AM, David Ripton wrote:
On 07/15/2013 10:03 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I have a patch up for review on this:
_https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35061/_
However, this doesn't fix the vm_states.SOFT_DELETED mapping in
nova.api.openstack.common so if you show an instance with
vm
On 07/15/2013 10:03 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I have a patch up for review on this:
_https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35061/_
However, this doesn't fix the vm_states.SOFT_DELETED mapping in
nova.api.openstack.common so if you show an instance with
vm_states.SOFT_DELETED, the response status wil
chester, MN 55901-1407
United States
From: Matt Riedemann/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
,
Date: 07/01/2013 04:14 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Seperate out 'soft-deleted'
instances from 'deleted' ones?
For everyone's awareness, there is a bug related to this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1196255
Thanks,
MATT RIEDEMANN
Advisory Software Engineer
Cloud Solutions and OpenStack Development
Phone: 1-507-253-7622 | Mobile: 1-507-990-1889
E-mail: mrie...@us.ibm.com
3605 Hwy 52 N
Rochest
