1. [NFV] is a tag.
2. This would appear to be a set of 'review me' mails to the mailing list,
which I believe is frowned upon.
3. garyk's stuff is only questionably [NFV], I would argue, though all
worthwhile patches. (That's a completely subjective judgement, so take it
as you will.)
Might be a b
On 2 July 2014 10:39, Gary Kotton wrote:
> There are some patches that are relevant to the NFV support. There are
> as follows:
>
Additionally, we who are building Deutsche Telekom's open source NFV
implementation will be able to make that available to the whole community
if the VIF_VHOSTUSER s
Le 02/07/2014 10:39, Gary Kotton a écrit :
> Hi,
> There are some patches that are relevant to the NFV support. There are
> as follows:
>
> 1. Current exception handling for interface attachment is broken
> - https://review.openstack.org/103091
> 2. The V2 port attach is a blocking call. This
Hi,
There are some patches that are relevant to the NFV support. There are as
follows:
1. Current exception handling for interface attachment is broken -
https://review.openstack.org/103091
2. The V2 port attach is a blocking call. This cannot be changed so a
proposal to have the V3 as no