Boris Renski wrote:
There are a couple of additional things we are working on driver
verification front that, I believe, it is now time to socialize with the
dev community:
1. In addition to the scare tactic of deprecating the code for those
that don't test their drivers, we also want to
John Griffith wrote:
So we've talked about this a bit and had a number of ideas regarding
how to test and show compatibility for third-party drivers in Cinder.
This has been an eye opening experience (the number of folks that have
NEVER run tempest before, as well as the problems uncovered now
On 02/13/2014 02:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
John Griffith wrote:
So we've talked about this a bit and had a number of ideas regarding
how to test and show compatibility for third-party drivers in Cinder.
This has been an eye opening experience (the number of folks that have
NEVER run tempest
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
John Griffith wrote:
To add some controversy and keep the original intent of having only
known tested and working drivers in the Cinder release, I am going to
propose that any driver that has not submitted
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Walter A. Boring IV
walter.bor...@hp.com wrote:
On 02/13/2014 02:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
John Griffith wrote:
So we've talked about this a bit and had a number of ideas regarding
how to test and show compatibility for third-party drivers in Cinder.
This
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
Are any of these drivers new for Icehouse? I think adding broken drivers
in Icehouse is a mistake. The timing WRT Icehouse release schedule is
unfortunate but so is shipping immature drivers that have to be supported
and
Walter A. Boring IV walter.bor...@hp.com wrote on 02/13/2014 06:59:38
PM:
What I would do different for the Icehouse release is this:
If a driver doesn't pass the certification test by IceHouse RC1, then we
have a bug filed
against the driver. I would also put a warning message in the
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
John Griffith wrote:
To add some controversy and keep the original intent of having only
known tested and working drivers in the Cinder
On 02/13/2014 09:51 AM, Avishay Traeger wrote:
Walter A. Boring IV walter.bor...@hp.com wrote on 02/13/2014 06:59:38
PM:
What I would do different for the Icehouse release is this:
If a driver doesn't pass the certification test by IceHouse RC1, then we
have a bug filed
against the driver. I
Hey,
So we've talked about this a bit and had a number of ideas regarding
how to test and show compatibility for third-party drivers in Cinder.
This has been an eye opening experience (the number of folks that have
NEVER run tempest before, as well as the problems uncovered now that
they're
10 matches
Mail list logo
